Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter III: Power of Courts
Section 30: Sentence of imprisonment in default of fine
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
In plain words
A Magistrate can order imprisonment for not paying a fine, within the limits of section 29, and, where imprisonment is part of the sentence, not more than one-fourth of the maximum term the Magistrate could impose for the offence. This can be in addition to the maximum substantive sentence.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) The Court of a Magistrate may award such term of imprisonment in default of payment of fine as is authorised by law:
Provided that the term—
(a) is not in excess of the powers of the Magistrate under section 29;
(b) shall not, where imprisonment has been awarded as part of the substantive sentence, exceed one-fourth of the term of imprisonment which the Magistrate is competent to inflict as punishment for the offence otherwise than as imprisonment in default of payment of the fine.
(2) The imprisonment awarded under this section may be in addition to a substantive sentence of imprisonment for the maximum term awardable by the Magistrate under section 29.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 30
-
Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. Union of India & Others
Writ petition filed u/Art. 32 by one of the victims challenging the order of State of Gujarat granting remission and early release of 11 convicts held guilty in Bilkis Bano matter, if maintainable; writ petitions filed…
- Rana Nahid @ Reshma @ Sana & Anr. v. Sahidul Haq Chisti
- Sharad Hiru Kolambe v. State of Maharashtra and Others
- Radhey Shyam & Anr. v. Chhabi Nath & Ors.
- Shahejadkhan Mahebubkhan Pathan v. State of Gujarat
- Vijayan v. Sadanandan K. & Anr.
- Shanti Lal v. State of M.P.