Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Chapter IV: Suits in Particular Cases Suits by or against the Government or Public Officers in Their Official Capacity
Section 80: Notice
[(1)] [ Save as otherwise provided in sub-section (2), no suits [shall be instituted] against the Government (including the Government of the State of Jammu and Kashmir)] or against a public officer in respect of any act purporting to be done by such public officer in his official capacity, until the expiration of two months next after notice in writing has been [delivered to, or left at the office of]
(a) in the case of a suit against the Central Government, [except where it relates to a railway] a Secretary to that Government;
[(b)] in the case of a suit against the Central Government where it relates to railway, the General Manager of that railway;
[(bb) in the case of a suit against the Government of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, the Chief Secretary to that Government or any other officer authorized by that Government in this behalf;]
(c) in the case of a suit against [any other State Government], a Secretary to that Government or the Collector of the district; ***
* * * * *
and, in the case of a public officer, delivered to him or left at his office, stating the cause of action, the name, description and place of residence of the plaintiff and the relief which he claims; and the plaint shall contain a statement that such notice has been so delivered or left.
[(2) A suit to obtain an urgent or immediate relief against the Government (including the Government of the State of Jammu and Kashmir) or any public officer in respect of any act purporting to be done by such public officer in his official capacity, may be instituted, with the leave of the Court, without serving any notice as required by sub-section (I); but the Court shall not grant relief in the suit, whether interim or otherwise, except after giving to the Government or public officer, as the case may be, a reasonable opportunity of showing cause in respect of the relief prayed for in the suit:
Provided that the Court shall, if it is satisfied, after hearing the parties, that no urgent or immediate relief need be granted in the suit, return the plaint for presentation to it after complying with the requirements of sub-section (1).
(3) No suit instituted against the Government or against a public officer in respect of any act purporting to be done by such public officer in his official capacity shall be dismissed merely by reason of any error or defect in the notice referred to in sub-section (I), if in such notice
(a) the name, description and the residence of the plaintiff had been so given as to enable the appropriate authority or the public officer to identify the person serving the notice and such notice had been delivered or left at the office of the appropriate authority specified in sub-section (1), and
(b) the cause of action and the relief claimed by the plaintiff had been substantially indicated.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 80
-
Divyangnakumari Harisinh Parmar (Dead) and Others v. Union of India and Others
The following issues arise for determination in the instant appeals: (i) What is the true nature of the rights in the land granted to the Appellants; (ii) Whether the High Court was justified in interfering with and…
-
Odisha State Financial Corporation v. Vigyan Chemical Industries and Others
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant u/Art.227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the civil proceedings and the orders passed by the Courts below regarding the computation of interest…
-
M/s Dhanbad Fuels Private Limited v. Union of India & Anr.
Issue arose whether, due to non-compliance with s.12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, a suit should be dismissed u/Ord. VII r.11 CPC, or whether it should be kept in abeyance, directing the parties to first explore…
-
Yerikala Sunkalamma & Anr. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Revenue & Ors.
Whether the High Court was correct in setting aside the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellants were held to be the lawful owners of the ‘Patta Land’.
-
The State of West Bengal & Ors. v. Pam Developments Private Limited & Anr.
Whether an amendment to a plaint introducing a fresh cause of action can be allowed if it arises out of continuous transactions and does not alter the nature and character of the suit; whether the bar under Section 80…
-
Daliben Valjibhai & Ors. v. Prajapati Kodarbhai Kachrabhai & Anr.
Whether a suit for cancellation of a registered sale deed, filed within three years from the date of knowledge as alleged in the plaint, can be dismissed at the threshold under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil…
-
The State of Haryana & Anr. v. Amin Lal (Since Deceased) Through His Lrs & Ors.
Respondents/Plaintiffs had filed a suit for possession of the suit property against the Appellants/Defendants, i.e. State of Haryana and Public Works Department. The Trial Court decreed the suit in favour of the…
-
M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. v. M/s Shahaji Bhanudas Bhad
(i) Whether a fresh application u/s.11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the respondent could be said to be maintainable more particularly when no liberty to file a fresh application was granted…
-
Child in Conflict With Law Through His Mother v. The State of Karnataka and Another
(i) Whether the period provided for completion of preliminary assessment u/s. 14(3) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is mandatory or directory; (ii) Whether the words ‘Children’s…
-
Ram Balak Singh v. State of Bihar and Anr.
In view of the bar imposed u/s. 37 of the Bihar Consolidation of Upholdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956, the order of the Consolidation Authority confirming the title of the appellant over the suit land…
-
Union of India v. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
It is the case of the respondent company herein that at the time of booking the consignments, from Baad to Hisar via Palwal, the notified chargeable distance for calculating freight as per the Local Distance Table was…
- M/s TRINITY INFRAVENTURES LTD. & ORS. ETC. v. M. S.
- The State of Gujarat & Ors. v. Multiplex Assn. of
- Dr. Abraham Patani of Mumbai & Anr v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- M/S. Patil Automation Private Limited and Ors. v. Rakheja Engineers Private Limited
- State of Punjab and Others v. Dev Brat Sharma
- Arce Polymers Private Limited v. M/S. Alphine Pharmaceuticals Private Limited and Others
- Rashid Wali Beg v. Farid Pindari & Ors.
- Union of India & Ors. v. M/S Puna Hinda
- D.B. Basnett (D) Thr. Lrs. v. The Collector & Anr. East District, Gangtok, Sikkim & Anr.
- M Siddiq (D) Thr Lrs v. V. Mahant Suresh Das & Ors
- Nusli Neville Wadia v. Ivory Properties & Ors.
- M/S Natesan Agencies (Plantations) v. State Rep. by the Secretary to Government Environment and Forests Department
- G H Pam Developments Private Ltd. v. State of West Bengal
- Y. Savarimuthu v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
- Gopal Singh (Dead) by Lrs. v. Swaran Singh & Ors.
- The State of Bihar & Ors. v. Bihar Rajya Bhumi Vikas Bank Samiti
- State of Karnataka by Its Chief Secretary v. State of T. N. by Its Chief Secretary [Dipak Misra, Cji] 829 the State of Karnataka by Its Chief Secretarystate of Tamil Nadu by Its Chief Secretary & Ors.
- Sejal Glass Ltd. v. Navilan Merchants Pvt. Ltd.
- Orissa Olympic Association Th. General Secretary v. State of Orissa & Anr.
- V. Rajendran and Anr. v. Annasamy Pandlan (D) Thr. Lrs. Karthyayanl Natchiar
- Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, Patiala Through Its Managing Director & Anr. v. S. K. Sharma & Ors.
- Vohra Sadikbhai Rajakbhai & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- Pankajakshi (Dead) Through Lrs. & Others v. Chandrika & Others
- State of Gujarat v. M/S Kothari and Associates
- The City Municipal Council Bhalki, by Its Chief Officer v. Gurappa (D) by Lrs. & Anr.
- M/S. Fibre Boards (P) Ltd. Bangalore v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore
- State of Madhya Pradesh v. Maharani Ushadevi
- Foreshore Co-Operative Housing Society Limited v. Praveen D.Desai (Dead) Thr. Lrs. and Others