Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 · Chapter VI: Registration
Section 29: Cancellation or suspension of registration
29. Cancellation [or suspension] of registration—- (1) The proper officer may, either on his own motion or on an application filed by the registered person or by his legal heirs, in case of death of such person, cancel the registration, in such manner and within such period as may be prescribed, having regard to the circumstances where,—
(a) the business has been discontinued, transferred fully for any reason including death of the proprietor, amalgamated with other legal entity, demerged or otherwise disposed of; or
(b) there is any change in the constitution of the business; or
[(c) the taxable person is no longer liable to be registered under section 22 or section 24 or intends to optout of the registration voluntarily made under sub-section (3) of section 25:]
[Provided that during pendency of the proceedings relating to cancellation of registration filed by the registered person, the registration may be suspended for such period and in such manner as may be prescribed.]
(2) The proper officer may cancel the registration of a person from such date, including any retrospective date, as he may deem fit, where,—-
(a) a registered person has contravened such provisions of the Act or the rules made thereunder as may be prescribed; or
(b) a person paying tax under section 10 has not furnished [the return for a financial year beyond three months from the due date of furnishing the said return]; or
(c) any registered person, other than a person specified in clause (b), has not furnished returns for [such continuous tax period as may be prescribed]; or
(d) any person who has taken voluntary registration under sub-section (3) of section 25 has not commenced business within six months from the date of registration; or
(e) registration has been obtained by means of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts:
Provided that the proper officer shall not cancel the registration without giving the person an opportunity of being heard.
[Provided further that during pendency of the proceedings relating to cancellation of registration, the proper officer may suspend the registration for such period and in such manner as may be prescribed.]
(3) The cancellation of registration under this section shall not affect the liability of the person to pay tax and other dues under this Act or to discharge any obligation under this Act or the rules made thereunder for any period prior to the date of cancellation whether or not such tax and other dues are determined before or after the date of cancellation.
(4) The cancellation of registration under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, as the case may be, shall be deemed to be a cancellation of registration under this Act.
(5) Every registered person whose registration is cancelled shall pay an amount, by way of debit in the electronic credit ledger or electronic cash ledger, equivalent to the credit of input tax in respect of inputs held in stock and inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held in stock or capital goods or plant and machinery on the day immediately preceding the date of such cancellation or the output tax payable on such goods, whichever is higher, calculated in such manner as may be prescribed:
Provided that in case of capital goods or plant and machinery, the taxable person shall pay an amount equal to the input tax credit taken on the said capital goods or plant and machinery, reduced by such percentage points as may be prescribed or the tax on the transaction value of such capital goods or plant and machinery under section 15, whichever is higher.
(6) The amount payable under sub-section (5) shall be calculated in such manner as may be prescribed.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 14 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 29
- M/S Rijwan Sales Pvt. Ltd v. Principal Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax East Delhi
- M/S Discovery India Service v. Principal Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax North Delhi
- M/S Anurag Traders Through Its Prop Mukesh Chandra v. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii/Avato Ward No 76 Through Commissioner of Gst
- M/S Garvit International Through Proprietor (Ms. Deepika Gupta) v. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii/ Avato, Delhi
- Ashish Kumar Shukla Proprietor S.P.S Enterprises v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr
- Mona Jain (Prop. M/S Universal Metal Traders) v. Suprintendent Range-122, Central Goods and Services Tax, Delhi West
- M/S Vishal Enterprises v. Principal Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax West Delhi
- M/S Shree Hanuman Industries v. Principal Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax North Delhi
- M/S Medi International Inc. Through Its Proprietor Mr Gurkaran Singh v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Another
- M/S Faizal Enterprises v. Principal Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax East Delhi
- Surendra Kumar Saraf v. Principal Commissioner Delhi Goods and Services Tax & Anr
- M/S Aa Enterprises v. The Commissioner
- Tagg Digital Strategies Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner,Ward- 64,State Goods and Services Tax Department
- Satish Kumar Singh v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Shakti Metal Industries Proprietorship of Sumitra Sharma Through Legal Heir Sh. Devender Sharma v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Another
- Elliss Collections v. Union of India and Ors
- Bani Enterprises v. Commissioner of Cgst, Delhi North & Ors
- M/S Akash Garments India Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Anr
- Pramod Kumar v. Superintendent Range 109 Central Goods and Service Tax & Anr
- Nayara Industrial Mart Traders v. Principal Commissioner,Cgst and Anr
- Pankaj Mittal v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax (Cgst), Delhi North
- Chetan Asrani v. The Sales Tax Officer, Class II Ward 96, Ito, New Delhi
- Ram Niwas v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax & Anr
- Essar Foods and Commodities v. Commissioner of Cgst Delhi West
- M/S Hotsafe International v. Principal Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax North Delhi
- Sujeet Kumar Jha v. The Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato
-
Chief Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax & Ors. v. M/S Safari Retreats Private Ltd. & Ors.
Whether the definition of “plant and machinery” in the explanation appended to Section 17 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 applies to the expression “plant or machinery” used in clause (d) of sub-section…
- M/S Shree Mahaveer Metal Traders v. Principal Commissioner of Department of Trade and Taxes, Government of NCT of Delhi
- M/S Oscar Enterprises Through Its Proprietor Sh. Vikas v. Commissioner of Delhi Gst and Anr
- M/S Gian Chand Trilok Chand v. Commissioner of Dgst & Ors
- Riddhi Siddhi Enterprises v. Commissioner of Goods and Services Tax (Cgst), South Delhi & Anr
- M/S Prime Industries v. Principal Commissioner & Ors
- Arvind Sharma v. Superintendent, Range - 115, Central Goods and Service Tax & Anr
- Chima Ram Harnand Rai v. Principal Commissioner Department of Trade and Taxes Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr
- Sumeet Singh Legal Heir of Late Sh. Mohinder Mohan Singh Proprietor of M/S Saran Singh and Sons v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Ors
- M/S Supreme Enterprises v. Principal Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax North Delhi
- Puspendar v. Superintendent Range-152, Central Goods and Services Tax & Anr