Central Excise Act, 1944 · Chapter II: Levy and Collection of Duty
Section 4: Valuation of excisable goods for purposes of charging of duty of excise
- (1) Where under this Act, the duty of excise is chargeable on any excisable goods with reference to their value, then, on each removal of the goods, such value shall—
(a) in a case where the goods are sold by the assessee, for delivery at the time and place of the removal, the assessee and the buyer of the goods are not related and the price is the sole consideration for the sale, be the transaction value;
(b) in any other case, including the case where the goods are not sold, be the value determined in such manner as may be prescribed.
[Explanation.— For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that the price-cum-duty of the excisable goods sold by the assessee shall be the price actually paid to him for the goods sold and the money value of the additional consideration, if any, flowing directly or indirectly from the buyer to the assessee in connection with the sale of such goods, and such price-cum-duty, excluding sales tax and other taxes, if any, actually paid, shall be deemed to include the duty payable on such goods.]
(2) The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect of any excisable goods for which a tariff value has been fixed under sub-section (2) of Section 3.
(3) For the purposes of this section,—
(a) "assessee" means the person who is liable to pay the duty of excise under this Act and includes his agent;
(b) persons shall be deemed to be "related" if—
(i) they are inter-connected undertakings;
(ii) they are relatives;
(iii) amongst them the buyer is a relative and a distributor of the assessee, or a sub-distributor of such distributor; or
(iv) they are so associated that they have interest, directly or indirectly, in the business of each other.
Explanation.In this clause—
[(i) "inter-connected undertakings" means two or more undertakings which are inter-connected with each other in any of the following manners, namely—-
(A) if one owns or controls the other;
(B) where the undertakings are owned by firms, if such firms have one or more common partners;
(C) where the undertakings are owned by bodies corporate,—
(I) if one body corporate manages the other body corporate; or
(II) if one body corporate is a subsidiary of the other body corporate; or
(III) if the bodies corporate are under the same management; or
(IV) if one body corporate exercises control over the other body corporate in any other manner;
(D) where one undertaking is owned by a body corporate and the other is owned by a firm, if one or more partners of the firm,—
(I) hold, directly or indirectly, not less than fifty per cent of the shares, whether preference or equity, of the body corporate; or
(II) exercise control, directly or indirectly, whether as director or otherwise, over the body corporate;
(E) if one is owned by a body corporate and the other is owned by a firm having bodies corporate as its partners, if such bodies corporate are under the same management;
(F) if the undertakings are owned or controlled by the same person or by the same group;
(G) if one is connected with the other either directly or through any number of undertakings which are inter-connected undertakings within the meaning of one or more of the foregoing sub-clauses.
Explanation I.— For the purposes of this clause, two bodies corporate shall be deemed to be under the same management—
(i) if one such body corporate exercises control over the other or both are under the control of the same group or any of the constituents of the same group; or
(ii) if the Managing Director or manager of one such body corporate is the Managing Director or manager of the other; or
(iii) if one such body corporate holds not less than one-fourth of the equity shares in the other or controls the composition of not less than one-fourth of the total membership of the Board of Directors of the other; or
(iv) if one or more directors of one such body corporate constitute, or at any time within a period of six months immediately preceding the day when the question arises as to whether such bodies corporate are under the same management, constituted (whether independently or together with relatives of such directors or employees of the first mentioned body corporate) one-fourth of the directors of the other; or
(v) if the same individual or individuals belonging to a group, while holding (whether by themselves or together with their relatives) not less than one-fourth of the equity shares in one such body corporate also hold (whether by themselves or together with their relatives) not less than one-fourth of the equity shares in the other; or
(vi) if the same body corporate or bodies corporate belonging to a group, holding, whether independently or along with its or their subsidiary or subsidiaries, not less than one-fourth of the equity shares in one body corporate, also hold not less than one-fourth of the equity shares in the other; or
(vii) if not less than one-fourth of the total voting power in relation to each of the two bodies corporate is exercised or controlled by the same individual (whether independently or together with his relatives) or the same body corporate (whether independently or together with its subsidiaries); or
(viii) if not less than one-fourth of the total voting power in relation to each of the two bodies corporate is exercised or controlled by the same individuals belonging to a group or by the same bodies corporate belonging to a group, or jointly by such individual or individuals and one or more of such bodies corporate; or
(ix) if the directors of one such body corporate are accustomed to act in accordance with the directions or instructions of one or more of the directors of the other, or if the directors of both the bodies corporate are accustomed to act in accordance with the directions or instructions of an individual, whether belonging to a group or not.
Explanation II.— If a group exercises control over a body corporate, that body corporate and every other body corporate, which is a constituent of, or controlled by, the group shall be deemed to be under the same management.
Explanation III.— If two or more bodies corporate under the same management hold, in the aggregate, not less than one-fourth equity share capital in any other body corporate, such other body corporate shall be deemed to be under the same management as the first mentioned bodies corporate.
Explanation IV.— In determining whether or not two or more bodies corporate are under the same management, the shares held by financial institutions in such bodies corporate shall not be taken into account.
Illustration
Undertaking B is inter-connected with undertaking A and undertaking C is inter-connected with undertaking B. Undertaking C is inter-connected with undertaking A; if undertaking D is inter-connected with undertaking C, undertaking D will be inter-connected with undertaking B and consequently with undertaking A; and so on.
Explanation V —- For the purposes of this clause, "group" means a group of—
(i) two or more individuals, associations of individuals, firms, trusts, trustees or bodies corporate (excluding financial institutions), or any combination thereof, which exercises, or is established to be in a position to exercise, control, directly or indirectly, over any body corporate, firm or trust; or
(ii) "associated persons".
Explanation VI.—- For the purposes of this clause,—
(I) a group of persons who are able, directly or indirectly, to control the policy of a body corporate, firm or trust, without having a controlling interest in that body corporate, firm or trust, shall also be deemed to be in a position to exercise control over it;
(II) associated persons—
(a) in relation to a director of a body corporate, means—
(i) a relative of such director, and includes a firm in which such director or his relative is a partner;
(ii) any trust of which any such director or his relative is a trustee;
(iii) any company of which such director, whether independently or together with his relatives, constitutes one-fourth of its Board of Directors;
(iv) any other body corporate, at any general meeting of which not less than one-fourth of the total number of directors of such other body corporate are appointed or controlled by the director of the first mentioned body corporate or his relative, whether acting singly or jointly;
(b) in relation to the partner of a firm, means a relative of such partner and includes any other partner of such firm; and
(c) in relation to the trustee of a trust, means any other trustee of such trust;
(III) where any person is an associated person in relation to another, the letter shall also be deemed to be an associated person in relation to the former;]
(b) "relative" shall have the meaning assigned to it in clause (41) of Section 2 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);
(c) "place of removal" means—
(i) a factory or any other place or premises of production or manufacture of the excisable goods;
(ii) a warehouse or any other place or premises wherein the excisable goods have been permitted to be deposited without [payment of duty;] [(iii) a depot, premises of a consignment agent or any other place or premises from where the excisable goods are to be sold after their clearance from the factory,] from where such goods are removed;
[(cc) "time of removal", in respect of the excisable goods removed from the place of removal referred to in sub-clause (iii) of clause (c), shall be deemed to be the time at which such goods are cleared from the factory;]
(d) "transaction value" means the price actually paid or payable for the goods, when sold, and includes in addition to the amount charged as price, any amount that the buyer is liable to pay to, or on behalf of, the assessee, by reason of, or in connection with the sale, whether payable at the time of the sale or at any other time, including, but not limited to, any amount charged for, or to make provision for, advertising or publicity, marketing and selling organization expenses, storage, outward handling, servicing, warranty, commission or any other matter; but does not include the amount of duty of excise, sales tax and other taxes, if any, actually paid or actually payable on such goods.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 4
-
Lipi Boilers Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad
Issue arose whether the value of the duty paid bought out items delivered directly at the buyer’s site is liable to be included in the value of the boiler cleared by the assessee from its factory in completely knocked…
-
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise Nashik Commissionerate
Whether while computing excise duty under the Central Excise Act, 1944 on sale of petroleum products, price of the products can be considered as the sole consideration and whether the revenue was entitled to invoke…
- Commr. of Cen. Exc. Ahmedabad v. M/S Urmin
- Commissioner of Customs v. M/S. Kanak Export
- Commissioner of Customs v. M/S M.D. Overseas
- Commissioner of Customs v. M/S. Gulab Impex Enterprises Limited
- M/s TATA MOTORS LTD. v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
- Uber India Systems Private Limited v. Union of India & Anr
- M/S Bilag Industries P. Ltd. v. Commr. of Cen. Exc.
- Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Kanpur v. M/S. A. R. Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Etc.
- Hewlett Packard India Sales Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner
- Ashish Kumar v. Union of India & Ors
- The Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Calicut v. M/S. Cera Boards and Doors, Kannur Kerala & Ors.
- Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal & Ors. Etc.
- Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi
- M/S Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur
- Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Bangalore v. M/S Jsw Steel Ltd. (Formerly Known As Jindal Vijayanagar Steel Ltd.)
- Commissioner of Central Excise, v. M/S Grasim Industries Ltd.Through Its Secretary
- Commissioner of Customs Central Excise and Service Tax, Guntur v. M/S. the Andhra Sugars Ltd.
- Commissioner of Central Excise Service Tax v. Ultra Tech Cement Ltd.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad v. M/S. Ispat Metallics Industries Ltd. & Ors
- Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Nagpur v. M/S. Ispat Industries Ltd.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Tiruchirapalli v. M/S. Dalmia Cement(Bharat) Ltd.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur-I v. M/S. Indorama Synthetics (I) Ltd.
- M/S. Purolator India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise Delhi-Ill
- M/S. Tata Chemicals Ltd. v. The Collector of Central Excise, Ahmedabad
- Commissioner Central Excise, Mumbai-Ill v. Mis. Emco Ltd.
- Shabinaabraham & Ors. v. Collector of Central Excise & Customs
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Vapi v. Mis. Global Health Care Products Partnership Firm & Ors.
- M/S. K. R. C. D. (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai
- Nirlon Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad v. M/S. Detergents India Ltd. & Anr.
- Ramdev Food Products Private Limited v. State of Gujarat
- Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. Commnr. of Central Excise, New Delhi
- Union of India & Ors. v. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-Ii v. M/S. Super Synotex (India) Ltd. and Others
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai v. M/S. Fiat India (P) Ltd. & Anr.
- M/S. Royal Enfield (Unit of M/S Eicher Ltd.) v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai
- Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd v. The Commissioner of Central Excise and . Customs, Daman
- Commnr. of Central Excise, Chandigarh v. M/S. Pepsi Foods Ltd.
- National Leather Cloth Manufacturing Co. v. Union of India & Anr.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi v. M/S. Pearl Drinks Ltd.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore v. M/S. Grasim Industries Ltd.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Noida v. M/S. Accurate Meters Ltd.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi v. Ishaan Research Lab (P) Ltd. & Ors.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Vapi v. M/S. Kraftech Products Inc.
- Moriroku Ut India {P) Ltd. v. State of U.P. and Ors.
- M/S.Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. Commnr. of Central Excise, Jamshedpur
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur v. M/S. Rajasthan Spg. & Wvg. Mills Ltd., Etc. Etc.
- Commnr. of Central Excise, Allahabad v. M/S. Somaiya Organics (India) Ltd.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur v. M/S. Ballarpur Industries Ltd.
- Jayanti Food Processing (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Rajasthan
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-I v. M/S Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd.
- Commnr. of Central Excise, Calcutta v. M/S. Panihatl Rubber Ltd
- M/S. Alembic Glass Industries Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Central Excise
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi v. M/S. Action Construction Equipment (P) Ltd.
- Siddartha Tubes Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore (Mp)
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore v. M/S. S. Kumars Ltd. and Ors.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Bhubaneshwar-11 v. M/S Ifgt Refractories Ltd.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-I v. Bisleri International Pvt.Ltd.
- M/S. Saci Allied Products Ltd., U.P. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Belgaum v. M/S. Akay Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Belgaum v. M/S. Akay Cosmetic (P) Ltd., Humbli
- Triveni Glass Ltd., Allahabad v. Union of India and Ors.
- Godfrey Phillips India Ltd. and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Ors.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta v. M/S. Emkay Investments (P.) Ltd. and Anr.
- Escorts Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-Ii
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry v. M/S. Acer India Ltd.
- M/S. I.T.C. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi and Anr.
- M/S. H.B.L. Aircraft Batteries Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat v. M/S. Surat Textile Mills Ltd. and Ors.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-Ii v. M/S Allied Photograhics India Ltd.
- M/S Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh
- The State of Goa and Anr. v. M/S. Colfax Laboratories.Ltd. and Anr.
- Union of India v. Indalco Industries
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-Iii v. M/S I.S.P. Industries Ltd.
- Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi v. Guru Nanak Refrigeration Corpn.
- Escorts Limited and Anr. v. Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh
- Flash Laboratories Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi.
- The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Jamshedpur
- M/S. Escorts Jcb Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-Ii
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi v. M/S. Maruti Udyog Ltd.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut v. M/S. Kisan Sahkari Chinni Mills Ltd.
- Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi v. Vikram Detergent Ltd.
- M?S. Pawan Biscuits Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Patna
- Collector of Central Excise, Pune Etc. Etc. v. Dai Ichi Karkaria Ltd. Etc. Etc.
- Mary Angel and Ors. v. State of Tamil Nadu
- O.R.G. Systems Baroda v. Collector of Central Excise, Vadodra
- M/S Thermax Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise
- Calcutta Chromotype Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta
- Vst Industries Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad
- Union of India and Ors. Etc. v. Metal Box Co. of India Ltd. Etc.
- The Asstt. Collector of Central Excise v. Bata India Ltd.
- Phiroze Dinshaw Lam Etc. v. Union of India and Others.
- The Govt. of India and Ors. Etc. v. The Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. Etc.
- Metal Box India Ltd. v. The Collector of Central Excise, Madras
- Union of India and Anr. v. Century Manufacturing Company Ltd.
- Kirloskar Brothers Ltd., Dewas (M.P.) v. Union of India and Ors.
- Burn Standard Company Ltd. and Anr. v. Union of India and Others
- Seshasayee Paper & Boards Limited, Erode v. Collector of Central Excise, Coimbatore