Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 · Chapter III: Conciliation
Section 81: Admissibility of evidence in other proceedings
The parties shall not rely on or introduce as evidence in arbitral or judicial proceedings, whether or not such proceedings relate to the dispute that is the subject of the conciliation proceedings,—
(a) views expressed or suggestions made by the other party in respect of a possible settlement of the dispute;
(b) admissions made by the other party in the course of the conciliation proceedings;
(c) proposals made by the conciliator;
(d) the fact that the other party had indicated his willingness to accept a proposal for settlement made by the conciliator.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 16 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 81
-
M/S Sonali Power Equipments Pvt. Ltd. v. Chairman, Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Mumbai & Ors.
(i) Whether the Limitation Act applies to conciliation proceedings u/s.18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act), and even if not, whether time-barred debts can be referred to…
-
M/S Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council and Another
Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution would be maintainable against an order passed by the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC) in exercise of power under Section 18 of the…
-
NBCC (India) Ltd. v. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Whether an MSME cannot make a reference to the Facilitation Council for dispute resolution under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 if it is not registered under Section 8 of the…
-
S.V. Samudram v. State of Karnataka & Anr
The Civil Judge modified the award passed by the Arbitrator reducing the amount awarded as also interest thereupon, i.e., Rs.14,68,239/- @ 18% to only 25% of the tender amount which equals to Rs.3,71,564/- and the…
-
Batliboi Environmental Engineers Limited v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited and Another
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court was justified in allowing the appeal filed by the respondents u/s. 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and thereby setting aside the arbitral award.
- Gujarat State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. v. Mahakali Foods Pvt. Ltd. (Unit 2) & Anr
- Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.
- M/S. Vijeta Construction v. M/S. Indus Smelters Ltd. & Anr.
- M/S. Silpi Industries Etc. v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. Etc.
- Perry Kansagra v. Smriti Madan Kansagra
- Govind Prasad Sharma & Ors. v. Doon Valley Officers Cooperative Housing Society Ltd
- Power Machines India Limited v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.