Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 · Chapter II
Section 8: Power to refer parties to arbitration where there is an arbitration agreement
[(1) A judicial authority, before which an action is brought in a matter which is the subject of an arbitration agreement shall, if a party to the arbitration agreement or any person claiming through or under him, so applies not later than the date of submitting his first statement on the substance of the dispute, then, notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of the Supreme Court or any Court, refer the parties to arbitration unless it finds that prima facie no valid arbitration agreement exists.]
(2) The application referred to in sub-section (1) shall not be entertained unless it is accompanied by the original arbitration agreement or a duly certified copy thereof:
[Provided that where the original arbitration agreement or a certified copy thereof is not available with the party applying for reference to arbitration under sub-section (1), and the said agreement or certified copy is retained by the other party to that agreement, then, the party so applying shall file such application along with a copy of the arbitration agreement and a petition praying the Court to call upon the other party to produce the original arbitration agreement or its duly certified copy before that Court.]
(3) Notwithstanding that an application has been made under sub-section (1) and that the issue is pending before the judicial authority, an arbitration may be commenced or continued and an arbitral award made.
State amendments to this section
Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh (UTs).—
Insertion of section 8A and section 8B.—After section 8, insert the following sections, namely:—
"8A. Power of the court, seized of petitions under sections 9 or 11 of the Act, to refer the dispute to Mediation or Conciliation.—(1) If during the pendency of petitions under sections 9 or 11 of the Act, it appears to the court, that there exists elements of a settlement which may be acceptable to the parties, the court may, with the consent of parties, refer the parties, for resolution of their disputes, to,—
(a) mediation; or
(b) conciliation.
(2) The procedure for reference of a dispute to mediation is as under—
(a) where a dispute has been referred for resolution by recourse to mediation, the procedure framed under that Act shall apply;
(b) in case of a successful resolution of the dispute, the Mediator shall immediately forward the mediated settlement to the referral court;
(c) on receipt of the mediated settlement, the referral court shall independently apply its judicial mind and record a satisfaction that the mediated settlement is genuine, lawful, voluntary, entered into without coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation and that there is no other legal impediment in accepting the same;
(d) the court shall record a statement on oath of the parties, or their authorised representatives, affirming the mediated settlement as well as a clear undertaking of the parties to abide by the terms of the settlement;
(e) if satisfied, the court shall pass an order in terms of the settlement;
(f) if the main petition, in which the reference was made is pending, it shall be disposed of by the referral court in terms thereof;
(g) if the main petition, in which the reference was made stands disposed of, the mediated settlement and the matter shall be listed before the referral court, which shall pass orders in accordance with clauses (iii), (iv) and (v);
(h) such a mediated settlement, shall have the same status and effect as an arbitral award and may be enforced in the manner specified under section 36 of the Act.
(3) With respect to reference of a dispute to conciliation, the provisions of Part II of this Act shall apply as if the conciliation proceedings were initiated by the parties under the relevant provision of this Act.
8B. Power of the court, seized of matters under sections 34 or 37 of the Act, to refer the dispute to Mediation or Conciliation.—(1) If during the pendency of a petition under section 34 or an appeal under section 37 of the Act, it appears to the court, that there exists elements of a settlement which may be acceptable to the parties, the court may, with the consent of parties, refer the parties, for resolution of their disputes, to:—
(a) mediation; or
(b) conciliation.
(2) The procedure for reference of a dispute to mediation is as under:—
(a) where a dispute has been referred for resolution by recourse to mediation, the procedure framed under the Act shall apply;
(b) in case of a successful resolution of the dispute, the Mediator shall immediately forward the mediated settlement to the referral court;
(c) on receipt of the mediated settlement, the referral court shall independently apply its judicial mind and record a satisfaction that the mediated settlement is genuine, lawful, voluntary, entered into without coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation and that there is no other legal impediment in accepting the same;
(d) the court shall record a statement on oath of the parties, or their authorized representatives, affirming the mediated settlement, a clear undertaking of the parties to abide by the terms of the settlement as well as statement to the above effect;
(e) if satisfied, the court shall pass an order in terms of the settlement;
(f) if the main petition, in which the reference was made is pending, it shall be disposed of by the referral court in terms thereof;
(g) if the main petition, in which the reference was made stands disposed of, the mediated settlement and the matter shall be listed before the referral court, which shall pass orders in accordance with clauses (iii), (iv) and (v);
(h) such a mediated settlement, shall have the status of a modified arbitral award and may be enforced in the manner specified under section 36 of the Act.
(3) With respect to reference of a dispute to conciliation, the provisions of Part III of the Act, shall apply as if the conciliation proceedings were initiated by the parties under the relevant provision of this Act."
[Vide the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization (Adaptation of Central Laws) Order, 2020, notification No. S.O. 1123(E) dated (18-3-2020) and Vide Union Territory of Ladakh Reorganisation (Adaptation of Central Laws) Order, 2020, notification No. S.O. 3774(E), dated (23-10-2020).]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 16 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 8
-
K. Mangayarkarasi & Anr. v. N.J. Sundaresan & Anr.
Can a trademark infringement suit be referred to arbitration if the defendant questions its maintainability on the ground of existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties and seeks a reference under Section…
-
INSC 1066 and SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning,
Whether an arbitral tribunal has the authority or power to implead or join a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement as a party to the arbitration proceedings.
-
M/s Citicorp Finance (India) Limited v. Snehasis Nanda
Whether on facts, the complainant-respondent would come under the definition of ‘consumer’ in terms of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986; whether any liability rested on the appellant to disburse the entire amount of…
-
SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning
Issue arose whether the execution of a discharge voucher towards the full and final settlement between the parties would operate as a bar to invoke arbitration; as regards the scope and standard of judicial scrutiny…
-
Sushma Shivkumar Daga & Anr. v. Madhurkumar
The trial Court referred the matter to arbitration and the said decision was upheld by the High Court. Whethe r the Trial Court and the High Court have rightly referred the ma tter to arbitration or the dispute is of…
-
N N Global Mercantile (P) Ltd. v. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. (2023) 7
The issue at hand arose in the context of three statutes; the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The Stamp Act imposes duty on “instruments”.…
- Cox and Kings Ltd. v. Sap India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
-
Smt. M. Hemalatha Devi & Ors. v. B. Udayasri
Whether the dispute between the parties is arbitrable, and once a party has availed the remedy before a public forum under a special beneficial legislation, can it be compelled to go for arbitration.
- Vinod Kumar Sachdeva (Dead) Thr Lrs v. Ashok Kumar
- Gujarat Composite Limited v. A Infrastructure
- M/s N. N. GLOBAL MERCANTILE PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/s
- Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. v. Alok Kumar Lodha & Ors
- Cox and Kings Limited v. Sap India Private Limited & Another
- Ellora Paper Mills Limited v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Ravinder Kumar Dhariwal & Anr. v. The Union of India & Ors.
- Tata Consultancy Services Limited v. Vishal Ghisulal Jain, Resolution Professional, Sk Wheels Private Limited
- Secunderabad Cantonment Board v. M/S B. Ramachandraiah & Sons
- Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Nortel Networks India Pvt. Ltd.
- Pravin Electricals Pvt. Ltd. v. Galaxy Infra and Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
- Chintels India Ltd. v. Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd.
- M/S. N.N. Global Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. & Others
- Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. v. Abhishek Khanna & Others
- Vidya Drolia and Others v. Durga Trading Corporation
- Deccan Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. Regency Mahavir Properties & Ors.
- G H Quippo Construction Equipment Limited v. Janardan Nirman Pvt. Limited
- Bgs Sgs Soma Jv v. Nhpc Ltd.
- M/S. Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited v. Northern Coal Field Limited
- M/S Avinash Hitech City 2 Society & Ors. v. Boddu Manikya Malini & Anr. Etc.
- M/S Mayavti Trading Pvt. Ltd. v. Pradyuat Deb Burman
- Zenith Drugs & Allied Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Represented by Its Managing Director, Shri Uday Krishna Paul v. M/S. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd.
- Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd.
- M/S. Emaar Mgf Land Limited v. Aftab Singh
- M/S. Caravel Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S. Premier Sea Foods Exim Pvt. Ltd.
- Samir Narain Bhojwani v. M/S. Aurora Properties and Investments and Anr.
- Ameet Lalchand Shah and Others v. Rishabh Enterprises and Another
- Purushottam S/O Tulsiram Badwaik v. Anil & Ors.
- Cheran Properties Limited v. Kasturi and Sons Limited and Ors.
- Himangni Enterprises v. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia
- Mrs. Hema Khattar & Anr. v. Shiv Khera
- Greaves Cotton Limited v. United Machinery and Appliances.
- Ananthesh Bhakta Represented by Mother Usha A.Bhakta & Ors. v. Nayana S. Bhakta & Ors.
- A. Ayyasamy v. A. Paramasivam & Ors.
- M/S. Sundaram Finance Limited and Another v. T. Thankam
- Anil S/O Jagannath Rana and Others v. Rajendra S/O Radhakishan Rana and Others
- Mr. Vikram Bakshi & Ors. v. Ms. Sonia Khosla (Dead) by Lrs.
- Ranjit Kumar Bose & Anr. v. Anannya Chowdhury & Anr
- Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc.
- M/S. National Seeds Corporation Ltd. v. M. Madhusudhan Reddy and Another
- Booz-Allen & Hamilton Inc. v. SBI Home Finance Ltd. & Ors.
- Sirajudeen Kasim & Anr. v. M/S Paramount Investments Ltd.
- H. Srinivas Pai & Anr. v. H.V. Pai (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors.
- Vijay Kumar Sharma @ Manju v. Raghunandan Sharma @ Baburam & Ors.
- N. Radhakrishnan v. M/S. Maestro Engineers & Ors.
- The Branch Manager, M/S. Magma Leasing and Finance Limited and Anr. v. Potluri Madhavilata and Anr.
- Yogi Agarwal v. M/S, Inspirnfion Clothes & U and Ors.
- Brigadier Man Mohan Sharma, Frgs (Retd.) v. Lt. Gen. Depinder Singh
- M/S Indtel Technical Services Pvt. Ltd. v. W.S. Atkins Rail Ltd.
- Sumitomo Corporation v. Cdc Financial Services (Mauritius) Ltd. & Ors.
- Atul Singh & Ors. v. Sunil Kumar Singh & Ors.
- Maruti Udyog Limited v. Mahinder C. Mehta and Ors.
- Bharat Sewa Sansthan v. U.P. Electronics Corporation Ltd.
- Sandeep Kumar and Ors. v. Master Ritesh and Ors.
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited and Anr. v. M/S Verma Transport Company
- Management Committee of Montfort Senior Secondary School v. Shri Vijay Kumar and Ors.
- Secur Industries Ltd. v. M/S. Godrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. and Anr.
- Bharat Hydro Power Corpn. Ltd. and Ors. v. State of Assam and Anr.
- Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd v. Jayesh H. Pandya and Anr.
- J.P. Anand v. D.G. Baffna
- Haryana Telecom Ltd. v. Sterlite Industires (India) Ltd.