Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 · Chapter X
Section 43: Limitations
(1) The Limitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963), shall apply to arbitrations as it applies to proceedings in court.
(2) For the purposes of this section and the Limitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963), an arbitration shall be deemed to have commenced on the date referred to in section 21.
(3) Where an arbitration agreement to submit future disputes to arbitration provides that any claim to which the agreement applies shall be barred unless some step to commence arbitral proceedings is taken within a time fixed by the agreement, and a dispute arises to which the agreement applies, the Court, if it is of opinion that in the circumstances of the case undue hardship would otherwise be caused, and notwithstanding that the time so fixed has expired, may on such terms, if any, as the justice of the case may require, extend the time for such period as it thinks proper.
(4) Where the Court orders that an arbitral award be set aside, the period between the commencement of the arbitration and the date of the order of the Court shall be excluded in computing the time prescribed by the Limitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963), for the commencement of the proceedings (including arbitration) with respect to the dispute so submitted.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 16 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 43
-
My Preferred Transformation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd.
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petition filed by the appellants u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as barred by time; whether the provisions of Limitation Act, 1963 apply to…
-
State of Uttar Pradesh and Another v. R.K. Pandey and Another
Matter pertains to the enforceability of the ex-parte awards against the employer-State Government and the principal of the medical college, when the employer objected the authenticity of the arbitration agreement…
-
Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Limited v. Maharashtra Small Scale
High Court whether justified in setting aside the arbitral award and holding that Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. (MSSIDCL) cannot be said to be a buyer within the meaning of Interest on…
- The Project Director, National Highways No. 45 E and 220 National Highways Authority of India v. M. Hakeem & Anr.
- M/S. Silpi Industries Etc. v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. Etc.
- A.P. Power Coordination Committee & Ors. v. Mis. Lanco Kondapalli Power Ltd. & Ors.
- T.N. Generation & Distbn. Corpn. Ltd. v. Ppn Power Gen. Co. Pvt. Ltd.
- Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. v. Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.
- Gulbarga University v. Mallikarjun S. Kodagali and Anr.
- United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. J.A. Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
- State of Goa v. M/S. Western Builders
- Milk Food Ltd. v. M/S. Gmc Ice Cream (P) Ltd.