Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 · Chapter VIII
Section 36: Enforcement
(1) Where the time for making an application to set aside the arbitral award under section 34 has expired, then, subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), such award shall be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), in the same manner as if it were a decree of the court.
(2) Where an application to set aside the arbitral award has been filed in the Court under section 34, the filing of such an application shall not by itself render that award unenforceable, unless the Court grants an order of stay of the operation of the said arbitral award in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (3), on a separate application made for that purpose.
(3) Upon filing of an application under sub-section (2) for stay of the operation of the arbitral award, the Court may, subject to such conditions as it may deem fit, grant stay of the operation of such award for reasons to be recorded in writing:
Provided that the Court shall, while considering the application for grant of stay in the case of an arbitral award for payment of money, have due regard to the provisions for grant of stay of a money decree under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908).]
[Provided further that where the Court is satisfied that a Prima facie case is made out that,—
(a) the arbitration agreement or contract which is the basis of the award; or
(b) the making of the award,
was induced or effected by fraud or corruption, it shall stay the award unconditionally pending disposal of the challenge under section 34 to the award.
Explanation.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that the above proviso shall apply to all court cases arising out of or in relation to arbitral proceedings, irrespective of whether the arbitral or court proceedings were commenced prior to or after the commencement of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 (3 of 2016).]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 16 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 36
-
MMTC Limited v. Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Pvt. Limited
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in not entertaining the objections filed by the appellant u/s.47 CPC and in dismissing the same; and whether at least prima facie the case of breach of fiduciary duty has…
-
Lifestyle Equities C.V. & Anr. v. Amazon Technologies INC.
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned judgment and order by which the application filed by the respondent herein (judgment debtor-original defendant) under Order XLI…
-
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. M/s. S.A. Builders Ltd.
Whether the Arbitrator had become functus officio after passing of the award dated 16.12.1997 and had no jurisdiction to issue the clarification dated 15.03.2005.
-
Ruchir Rastogi v. Pankaj Rastogi and Others
High Court if justified in quashing the FIR lodged by the appellant against respondents u/ss.457, 380 and 506, IPC.
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. A. Balakrishnan & Anr.
- Vaishno Devi Construction Rep. Thr. Sole Proprietor (D) Thr. Lrs & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Amazon.Com Nv Investment Holdings Llc v. Future Retail Limited & Ors.
- Pasl Wind Solutions Private Limited v. Ge Power Conversion India Private Limited
- Government of India v. 1.Vedanta Limited (Formerly Cairn India Ltd.) 2. Ravva Oil (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. 3. Videocon Industries Limited
- Hindustan Construction Company Limited & Anr.Dia & Ors. v. Union of India
- Power Machines India Limited v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
- M/S Centrotrade Minerals & Metal Inc. v. Hindustan Copper Ltd.
- Kanpur Jal Sansthan & Another v. M/S. Bapu Construction
- Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc.
- Vidur Impex and Traders Pvt. Ltd. and Others v. Tosh Apartments Pvt. Ltd. and Others
- Leela Hotels Ltd. v. Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd.
- Paramjeet Singh Patheja v. Icds Ltd.
- Mysore Cements Ltd. v. Svedala Barmac Ltd.