Advocates Act, 1961 · Chapter V: Conduct of Advocates
Section 35: Punishment of advocates for misconduct
(1) Where on receipt of a complaint or otherwise a State Bar Council has reason to believe that any advocate on its roll has been guilty of professional or other misconduct, it shall refer the case for disposal to its disciplinary committee.
[(1A) The State Bar Council may, either of its own motion or on application made to it by any person interested, withdraw a proceeding pending before its disciplinary committee and direct the inquiry to be made by any other disciplinary committee of that State Bar Council.]
(2) The disciplinary committee of a State Bar Council *** shall fix a date for the hearing of the case and shall cause a notice thereof to be given to the advocate concerned and to the Advocate-General of the State.
(3) The disciplinary committee of a State Bar Council after giving the advocate concerned and the Advocate-General an opportunity of being heard, may make any of the following orders, namely:—
(a) dismiss the complaint or, where the proceedings were initiated at the instance of the State Bar Council, direct that the proceedings be filed;
(b) reprimand the advocate;
(c) suspend the advocate from practice for such period as it may deem fit;
(d) remove the name of the advocate from the State roll of advocates.
(4) Where an advocate is suspended from practice under clause (c) of sub-section (3), he shall, during the period of suspension, be debarred from practising in any court or before any authority or person in India.
(5) Where any notice is issued to the Advocate-General under sub-section (2), the Advocate-General may appear before the disciplinary committee of the State Bar Council either in person or through any advocate appearing on his behalf.
[Explanation.— In this section, [section 37 and section 38], the expressions "Advocate-General" and "Advocate-General of the State" shall, in relation to the Union territory of Delhi, mean the Additional Solicitor General of India.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 16 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 35
-
Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa v. Rajiv Nareshchandra Narula & Ors.
Matter pertains to filing of frivolous complaint against two advocates before the Bar Council which took cognizance of the complaint and referred the complaint to the Disciplinary Committee for inquiry.
- Daeyoung Jung v. Bar Council of India & Anr
- Abhijit Mishra v. Dr. Subash Vijayran & Anr
- K. Anjinappa v. K.C. Krishna Reddy and Anr.
- R. Muthukrishnan v. The Registrar General of the High Court of Judicature at Madras
- Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of India & Another
- M/S. Advanta India Ltd. v. B. N. Shivanna
- Kaushal Kishore Awasthi v. Balwant Singh Thakur & Anr.
- Ms. Eera Through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
- Mahipal Singh Rana, Advocate v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- Chander Prakash Tyagi v. Shri Benarsi Das(Dead) by Lrs. and Others
- Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh v. B. Narayan Swamy & Anr.
- Jaipur Vikas Pradhikaran v. Sri Ashok Kumar Choudhary & Ors.
- Reference Under Article 317 (1) No.2 of 2008 in Re: Mehar Singh Saini, Chairman, Hpsc and Ors. v. --
- Sanja Y Sitaram Khemka v. Stte of Maharashtra and Ors.
- Noratanmal Chouraria v. M.R. Murli and Anr.
- D. Saibaba v. Bar Council of India and Anr.
- Vikas Deshpande v. Bar Council of India and Ors.
- Shambhu Ram Yada V v. Hanuman Das Khatry
- N.G. Dastane v. Shrikant S. Shivde and Anr.
- R.D.Saxena v. Balram Prasad Sharma
- V. Sudeer Etc v. Bar Council of India and Another
- Baldev Singh Dhingra and Others v. Madan Lal Gupta and Others
- M/S. Northern Plastics Ltd. v. Hindustan Photo Films Mfg. Co. Ltd. and Ors.
- Hikmat Ali Khan v. Ishwar Prasad Arya and Ors.
- In Re: Vinay Chandra Mishra (The Alleged Contemner) v. In Re : Vinay Chandra Mishra (The Alleged Contemner)
- Mr. John D'Souza v. Edward Ani
- Devendra Bhai Shankar Mehta v. Rameshchandra Vithaldas Sheth and Anr.
- Veerabhadra Rao v. Tek Chand
- Pandurang Dattatreya Khandekar v. The Bar Council of Maharashtra Bombay & Ors.
- S.P. Gupta & Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Union of India & Ors. Etc. Etc.
- V. C Rangadurai v. D. Gopalan and Ors.
- J Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M. v. Dabholkar Etc. Etc.
- Adi Pherozshah Gandhi v. H. M. Seervai, Advocate-General of Maharashtra, Bombay