Second appeal
10 judgments tagged with this keyword in the official report. Filter or search within these · Subject index
-
Haryana Power Purchase Centre (Hppc) and Others v. Gmr Kamalanga Energy Limited and Others
The APTEL dismissed the appeals (Appeal no.135 of 2018 along with Appeal no.54 of 2019) and upheld the order dated 20.03.2018 passed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) in Petition No.105/MP/20173.
-
Smt. Arifa & Ors. v. Abhiman Apartment Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors.
Issue arose whether the liberty granted to file a fresh suit by the High Court would enable the party to revive a cause of action and save limitation, so as to enable raking up all grounds earlier raised and rejected by…
-
R. Nagaraj (Dead) through LRs. and Another v. Rajmani and Others
Whether the High Court was justified in remanding the matter to the trial Court for a fresh trial on the issue of limitation, despite the existence of concurrent findings, when section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908…
-
Inder Singh v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Whether the High Court was justified in condoning the delay in filing the Second Appeal.
-
Vipin Kumar v. Jaydeep & Others
Whether there has been a miscarriage of justice as the second appeal was allowed ex parte without hearing the appellant and without framing any substantial questions of law.
-
U. Sudheera & Others v. C. Yashoda & Others
Whether the High Court can pass any ad interim order for a limited period, before framing substantial question(s) of law, while dealing with a second appeal filed under Order XLI r/w Section 100 CPC.
-
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramkumar Choudhary
Appellant-State challenged the High Court judgment dismissing the second appeal filed with an inordinate delay of 5 years holding that the delay was not explained satisfactorily.
-
Rama Kt. Barman (Died) Thr. Lrs. v. Md. Mahim Ali & Ors.
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court in second appeal wherein it created a new case for the party, framed the issues and decided them without following the procedure contemplated u/Ord. XLI.
-
Nek Pal & Ors. v. Nagar Palika Parishad & Ors.
Whether substantial questions of law are required to be formulated at the time of admission of a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, or at any time subsequent thereto.
-
Lehna Singh (D) By Lrs. v. Gurnam Singh (D) By Lrs. & Ors.
Issue arose whether the questions of law are not required to be framed in second appeal before Punjab and Haryana High Court whose jurisdiction in second appeal is circumscribed by provision of s.41 of the Punjab Act.