Condonation of delay
24 judgments tagged with this keyword in the official report. Filter or search within these · Subject index
-
State of Chhattisgarh v. Amit Aishwarya Jogi
Whether the three-Judge Bench judgment in the case of Lalu Prasad Yadav and Anr. v. State of Bihar and Anr. lays down the correct proposition of law, or whether the same requires reference to, and resolution by a larger bench.
-
M/s Anvita Auto Tech Works Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Aroush Motors & Anr.
Whether the High Court was correct in observing that on account of non-filing of written statement by the defendant, his right to cross-examination is taken away.
-
Vaneeta Patnaik v. Nirmal Kanti Chakrabarti & Ors.
Issue arose whether the Division Bench of the High Court is justified in non-suiting the appellant on the ground that her complaint was barred by limitation; and whether the subsequent event of removal of the appellant from the…
-
Thirunagalingam v. Lingeswaran & Anr.
An appeal suit along with the application for condonation of delay of 1116 days was preferred. The High Court allowed the application for condonation of delay of 1116 days. Whether the delay is to be condoned or not, and if the…
-
Tata Steel Ltd. v. Raj Kumar Banerjee & Ors.
(i) Whether the additional condonable period of 15 days as provided under section 61(2) IBC commences from the end of the prescribed limitation period of 30 days, in case the prescribed limitation period for filing the appeal…
-
Kanchhu v. Prakash Chand & Ors.
Matter pertains to sustainability of the order passed by the High Court allowing writ petition u/Art.227 of the Constitution and allowing multiple interlocutory applications-application for condonation of delay in filing recall…
-
Jharkhand Urja Utpadan Nigam Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
The High Court rejected the Interim Application No. 11269 of 2024 filed by the petitioner herein u/s.5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and thereby declined to condone the delay of 301 days in filing the main appeal u/s.13(1-A) of the…
-
A. Rajendra v. Gonugunta Madhusudhan Rao & Ors.
Whether the limitation to file an appeal under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code starts from the date of pronouncement of the order or from the date when the order is communicated to the parties.
-
Inder Singh v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Whether the High Court was justified in condoning the delay in filing the Second Appeal.
-
Om Prakash Gupta Alias Lalloowa (Now Deceased) & Ors. v. Satish Chandra (Now Deceased)
The issues before the Hon’ble Court were as to whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the application for condonation of delay in filing the application for substitution and could the second appeal be regarded as…
-
My Preferred Transformation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd.
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petition filed by the appellants u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as barred by time; whether the provisions of Limitation Act, 1963 apply to s.34 of the…
-
H. Guruswamy & Ors. v. A. Krishnaiah Since Deceased By LRs.
Order dated 05.08.2014 passed by the trial court rejecting application filed under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC came to be set aside by the High Court, which was challenged in the present appeal; The appellants submitted that there was a…
-
Pandurang Vithal Kevne v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited & Anr.
Whether the High Court rightly disallowed Petitioner’s application for condonation of delay and rejected the second review petition in light of Petitioner’s repeated and frivolous litigation.
-
Dwarika Prasad (D) Thr. LRs. v. Prithvi Raj Singh
Whether a separate application for condonation of delay is mandatory in cases where sufficient justification was provided while seeking restoration against ex-parte decree.
-
Nitin Mahadeo Jawale & Ors. v. Bhaskar Mahadeo Mutke
Whether the High Court was correct in setting aside the order passed by Trial Court wherein, Trial Court condoned the delay of 4½ Years for filing of written statement.
-
Rajneesh Kumar & Anr. v. Ved Prakash
Whether the litigant can be permitted to throw the entire blame on the head of the advocate for the delay in preferring appeal.
-
State Bank of India v. India Power Corporation Limited
The issue which arises for consideration is the interpretation of Rule 50 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 (NCLT Rules) and Rule 22 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016 (NCLAT Rules).
-
Ishwar (Since Deceased) Thr. Lrs & Ors. v. Bhim Singh & Anr.
Issue arose as to whether the execution court had jurisdiction to deal with the application for rescission of contract and extension of time to deposit the balance sale consideration; and if execution court had the jurisdiction,…
-
Dr. Vijay Dixit & Ors. v. Pagadal Krishna Mohan & Ors.
Whether the application(s) seeking condonation of delay to file written statement preferred before the consumer fora prior to 04.03.2020 i.e., the date of pronouncement of New India Assurance 2, must be decided on merits; and…
-
Delhi Development Authority v. Tejpal & Ors.
Whether the appellants made out sufficient cause for condonation of delay on the grounds of subsequent change of law brought in by Indore Development Authority v. Shailendra [2018] 2 SCR 1 and Indore Development Authority v.…
-
Shri Mallikarjun Devasthan, Shelgi v. Subhash Mallikarjun Birajdar and Others
Whether delay in submitting Change Report to record name in register maintained u/s 7 Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 (1950 Act) in relation to the Vahiwatdar (Administrator) of a Public Trust, can be condoned. Further,…
-
K.B. Lal (Krishna Bahadur Lal) v. Gyanendra Pratap & Ors.
Whether there was sufficient cause for delay of fourteen years in filing an application under Order IX, Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
-
Pathapati Subba Reddy (Died) by L.Rs. & Ors. v. The Special Deputy Collector (La)
Whether the High Court was justified in refusing to condone the delay of 5659 days in filing the proposed appeal against the judgment of the reference court under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, by some of the Legal…
-
Omdeo Baliram Musale & Ors. v. Prakash Ramchandra Mamidwar & Ors.
Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the application for restoration of revision petition (in a suit for declaration) and accompanying application for condonation of delay.