Back wages
9 judgments tagged with this keyword in the official report. Filter or search within these · Subject index
-
State of Punjab and Others v. Ex. C. Satpal Singh
Issue arose for consideration whether the disciplinary authority took into consideration the past conduct of the respondent while passing the dismissal order.
-
UCO Bank & Anr. v. Vijay Kumar Handa
The appellant-Bank dismissed the respondent from the services. Whether the respondent was entitled to receive the terminal benefits for the period of service he had rendered.
-
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Mahadeo Krishna Naik
Whether the appellant-Corporation is guilty of suggestio falsi by not disclosing what it had pleaded before the MACT and suppresio veri by suppressing the award; whether the High Court was justified in exercising review…
-
Shripal & Anr. v. Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad
Whether the services of the appellant-workmen (gardeners) were terminated without complying with Sections 6E and 6N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Appellants, if entitled to reinstatement with back wages as also…
-
Nutan Bharti Gram Vidyapith v. Government of Gujarat and Anr.
Issue arose as regards the liability of the appellant-private college covered under the grant-in-aid scheme of the State Government, to pay retiral benefits to the respondent-employee.
-
Manilal v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Matter pertains to the appointment of the appellant to the post of Teacher Grade-III for TSP Area.
-
Anantdeep Singh v. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh & Anr.
Miscellaneous application is filed by the appellant seeking direction to reinstate him into service as civil judge with all the consequential benefits in view of the order dated 20.04.2022 passed by the Supreme Court in C.A.No.…
-
The General Manager, M/S Barsua Iron Ore Mines v. The Vice President United Mines Mazdoor Union and Ors.
Respondent initially declared his date of birth as 27.12.1948. Later, in descriptive roll, he changed his initially recorded date of birth i.e. 27.12.1948 to 12.03.1955. Based on his declaration at the time of initial employment…
-
Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. v. Brajrajnagar Coal Mines Workers’ Union
Whether the Tribunal was justified in entertaining the reference of an industrial dispute when a binding settlement under Section 18 (1) read with Section 19(2) and Section 36 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 was arrived at…