VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Punjab and Haryana High Court 2025 › High Court of Punjab and Haryana

Guddi Kaur v. State of Punjab

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Decided
18 November 2025
Bench
Sumeet Goelauthor
Case no.
CRM-M 63651/2025

Judgment

1o o o o 236o INoTHEoHIGHoCOURToOFoPUNJABoANDoHARYANAoAToINoTHEoHIGHoCOURToOFoPUNJABoANDoHARYANA ATo CHANDIGARHo o o GuddioKauroo ….Petitionero versuso StateoofoPunjabo ….Respondento o Dateoofodecision:oNovembero18,o2025o DateoofoUploading:oNovembero18,o2025o o CORAM:o HON'BLEoMR.oJUSTICEoSUMEEToGOELo o Present:-o Mr.oHiteshoVerma,oAdvocateoforotheopetitioner.oo o o o Mr.oBaljinderoSinghoSra,oAdditionaloAGoPunjab.oo o *****o***** SUMEEToGOEL,oJ.o(ORAL)oo o o o Presento petitiono haso beeno filedo undero Sectiono 483o ofo theo BharatiyaoNagarikoSurakshaoSanhita,o2023o(foroshorto'BNSS')oforograntoofo regularobailotootheopetitioneroinocaseobearingoFIRoNo.261odatedo18.06.2025,o registeredo foro theo offenceso punishableo undero Sectionso 21o &o 29o ofo theo NarcoticoDrugsoandoPsychotropicoSubstancesoAct,o1985o(foroshorto'NDPSo Act')o(Sectiono29oofotheoNDPSoActoaddedolateroon),oatoPoliceoStationoCityo Barnala,oDistrictoBarnala.oo

2.o o Theogravamenoofotheoallegationsoagainstotheopetitioneroisothatoheo isoanoaccusedoofobeingoinvolvedoinoanoFIRopertainingotooNDPSoActoinvolvingo 14o bottleso ofo intoxicanto syrup,o labeledo WINGSo PHARMA,o eacho bottleo containingo 100o MLoando intoxicantopowdero (Heroin),o weighingo 90ograms,o

o o 2o o o allegedlyo recoveredo fromo theo co-accusedo ofo theo petitioner,o namely,o ChamkauroSingh,oandosaidoco-accusedonominatedotheopresentopetitioneroinohiso disclosure.oo

3.o o Learnedocounseloforotheopetitionerohasoiteratedothatotheopetitionero isoinocustodyosinceo07.07.2025.oLearnedocounselohasofurtheroarguedothatotheo petitionero haso beeno falselyo implicatedo intoo theo FIRo ino question.o Learnedo counselohasoarguedothatomandatoryoprovisionsoofotheoNDPSoActohaveonoto scrupulouslyo beeno compliedo with,o ando thus,o theo prosecutiono caseo sufferso fromoinherentodefects.oLearnedocounselohasofurtheroiteratedothatoassumingo arguando,otheoprosecutionoversionoisotakenotoobeocorrect,oprimeoprosecutiono evidenceo availableo againsto theo petitionero iso ino theo shapeo ofo disclosureo statemento ofo co-accused,o namely,o Chamkauro Singh.o Learnedo counselo haso furtheroiteratedothatotheopetitionerohasosufferedoincarcerationoforomoreothano04o months.oThus,oregularobailoisoprayedofor.oo

4.o o Learnedo Stateo counselo haso opposedo theo presento petitiono byo arguingothatotheoallegationsoraisedoagainstotheopetitioneroareoseriousoinonatureo and,othus,otheopetitionerodoesonotodeserveotheoconcessionoofotheoregularobail.o Learnedo Stateo counselo seekso too placeo ono recordo custodyo certificateo datedo

17.11.2025,oinotheoCourtotoday,owhichoisotakenoonorecord.oo

5.o o Iohaveoheardocounseloforotheorivalopartiesoandohaveogoneothrougho theoavailableorecordsoofotheocase.oo

6.o o Theopetitionerowasoarrestedoono07.07.2025oandoisoinocontinuouso custodyosinceothen.oTheoculminationoofoinvestigationoasoalsootrialoemanatingo therefrom,oinocaseooccasionosooarises,owillotakeoitsoownotime.oTheopetitionero hasobeenoimplicatedoasoanoaccusedoinotheoFIRoinoquestionosolelyoonotheobasiso

o o 3o o o ofodisclosureostatementoofoco-accused,onamely,oChamkauroSinghofromowhomo theoallegedocontrabandowasorecovered.oAsoperotheoprosecutionoversion,othereo isonoootheromaterialoavailableotooconnectotheopetitionerowithotheocontrabando excepto foro theosaidodisclosureostatement.o Ito isopertinentotoo noteothato sucho disclosureostatements,oinotheoabsenceoofocorroborativeoevidenceoholdolimitedo evidentiaryovalueoandocannotobeosoleobasisoforoimplicatingotheopetitioner.oTheo relianceoonothisounsubstantiatedostatementoraisesoseriousodoubtsoaboutotheo fairnesso ando objectivityo ofo theo investigation.o Ito iso noto ino disputeo thato theo petitionerowasonotopresentoatotheospot.oTheoveracityoandoweightageorequiredotoo beoattachedotootheodisclosureostatementomadeobyotheoco-accusedowillobeofullyo testedoatotheotimeoofotrial.oTheorivalocontentionsoraisedoatoBarogiveoriseotoo debatableoissues,owhichoshallobeoratiocinatedouponoduringotheocourseoofotrial.o Thiso Courto doeso noto deemo ito appropriateo too delveo deepo intoo theseo rivalo contentions,oatothisostage,olestoitomayoprejudiceotheotrial.oNothingotangibleohaso beenobroughtoforwardotooindicateotheolikelihoodoofotheopetitioneroabscondingo fromotheoprocessoofojusticeoorointerferingowithotheoprosecutionoevidence.oo

6.1.o o Atothisojuncture,oitowouldobeoappositeotooreferotooaojudgmento passedobyothisoCourtoinoAnshuloSardanaoversusoStateoofoPunjab,opassedoino CRM-M-65094-2024o (2025:o PHHC:004198),o wherein,o aftero relyingo upono theoratioodecidendioofotheojudgmentsoofotheoHon'bleoSupremeoCourtoinoTofano SinghoversusoStateoofoTamiloNadu,oAIRo2020oSupremeoCourto5592;oSmt.o Najmunisha,o Abdulo Hamido Chandmiyao @o Ladooo Bapuo versuso Stateo ofo Gujrat,o Narcoticso Controlo Bureau,o 2024o INSCo 290;o Stateo byo (NCB)o Bengaluruo vs.o Pallulabido Ahmado Arimuttao &o Anr.',o 2022o (1)o RCRo (Criminal)o762;oandoVijayoSinghovs.oTheoStateoofoHaryana,obearingoSpecialo

o o 4o o o LeaveotooAppealo(Crl.)oNo.(s)o1266/2023,odecidedoono17.05.2023,ohasoheldo thus:oo "6.3oo o Itoisoaowelloestablishedoprincipleoofolawothatoaoconfessiono madeobyoaoco-accusedounderoSectiono67oofotheoNDPSoActoisoinherentlyoao veryoweakopieceoofoevidence.ooSuchostatement(s),obyothemselves,ocannoto formo theo soleo basiso foro theo convictiono ofo ano individualo ando musto beo scrutinizedo witho utmosto cautiono ino conjunctiono witho othero substantiveo evidence.oMoreover,onoorecoveryohasobeenoeffectedofromotheopossessionoofo theopetitioner,owhoohasobeenosubsequentlyoimplicatedoasoanoaccusedosolelyo ono theo basiso ofo disclosureo statemento ofo theo co-accused.o However,o aso regularobailopertainsotoolifeoandolibertyoofoindividual,oCourtsoareoobligatedo toostrikeoaobalanceobetweenosafeguardingopersonalolibertyoandoensuringotheo effectiveo administrationo ofo justiceo aso alsoo investigation.o Theo finalo evidentiaryovalueoandoadmissibilityoofotheodisclosureostatementomadeobyoao co-accusedo fallo withino theo domaino ofo theo trialo Courto ando areo too beo adjudicatedoduringotheocourseoofotheotrialoinoaccordanceowithoestablishedo principlesoofolaw.oHowever,owhileoadjudicatingoaopleaofororegularobail,othiso Courto cannoto remaino obliviouso too theo circumstanceso undero whicho theo petitionerohasobeenoarraignedooroimplicated,oincludingotheonatureoofotheo allegations,otheoevidenceolinkingotheopetitionerotootheooffenceoasowelloasotheo specificoroleoattributedotootheopetitioneroinotheocommissionoofotheoallegedo offence.oAoprimaofacieoexaminationoofotheseofactorsoisoessentialotooensureo thatotheoprocessoofolawoisonotomisused,oabusedooromisdirected."oo o

6.2.o o Further,othisoCourtoinotheocaseoofoJaswinderoSinghoaliasoKalao versuso Stateo ofo Punjabo passedo ino CRM-M-33729-2025o (2025:PHHC:089161)ohasoheldothus:oo "14.o o Aso ao sequituro too above-saido rumination,o theo followingo postulatesoemerge:o

(I)o (i)o Aobailopleaoonomerits;oinorespectoofoanoFIRounderoNDPSoActo ofo1985oinvolvingooffence(s)ounderoSectiono19ooroSectiono24ooro Sectiono 27-Ao thereofo ando foro offence(s)o involvingo commercialo quantity;o iso essentiallyo requiredo too meeto witho theo rigour(s)o ofo Sectiono37oofoNDPSoAct.ooo o o (ii)oo Theorigour(s)oofoSectiono37oofoNDPSoActodoonotoapplyotooao bailoplea(s)oonomedicaloground(s),ointerimobailoonoaccountoofoanyo exigencyoincludingotheoreasonoofodemiseoofoaocloseofamilyorelativeo etc.o o o o (iii)o Theorigour(s)oofoSectiono37oofoNDPSoActopaleointooobliviono whenobailoisosoughtoforoonoaccountoofolongoincarcerationoinoviewoofo Articleo21oofotheoConstitutionoofoIndiaoi.e.owhereotheobail-applicanto hasosufferedolongounder-trialocustody,otheotrialoisoprocrastinatingo andofollyothereofoisonotoattributableotoosuchobail-applicant.ooo o II.o TheotwinoconditionsocontainedoinoSectiono37(1)(b)oofoNDPSoActo areo ino additiono too theo conditions/parameterso containedo ino Cr.P.C./BNSSooroanyootheroapplicableoextantolaw.oo o

o o 5o o o III.o TheotwinoconditionsocontainedoinoSectiono37(1)(b)oofoNDPSoActo areocumulativeoinonatureoandonotoalternativeoi.e.obothotheoconditionso areorequiredotoobeosatisfiedoforoaobail-pleaotoobeosuccessful.ooo o IV.o Foro considerationo byo bailo Courto ofo theo conditiono stipulatedo ino Sectiono37(1)(b)(i)oofoNDPSoActoi.e.o"thereoareoreasonableogroundso forobelievingothatoheoisonotoguiltyoofosuchooffence":o o

(i)o Theo bailo Courto oughto too sifto througho allo relevanto material,oincludingocase-dairy,oexclusivelyoforotheolimitedo purposeoofoadjudicatingosuchobailoplea.o o

(ii)o Sucho consideration,o concerningo theo assessmento ofo guiltooroinnocence,oshouldonotomirrorotheosameodegreeoofo scrutinyorequiredoforoanoacquittaloofotheoaccusedoatotheofinalo adjudicationo&oculminationoofotrial.oo o

(iii)o Plea(s)o ofo defenceo byo applicant-accused,o ifo any,o includingo material/documentso ino supporto thereof,o mayo beo lookedointoobyotheobail-Courtowhileoadjudicatingosuchobailo plea.ooo o V.o ForoconsiderationoofotheoconditionostipulatedoinoSectiono37(1)(b)(ii)o i.e.o'heoisonotolikelyotoocommitoanyooffenceowhileoonobail':o

(i)o Theo wordo 'likely'o oughto too beo interpretedo aso requiringoaodemonstrableoandosubstantialoprobabilityoofore-offendingo byo theo bail-applicant,o rathero thano ao mereo theoreticaloone,oasonooCourtocanopredictofutureoconductoofo theobail-applicant.oo o

(ii)o Theoentireofactualomatrixoofoaogivenocaseoincludingo theoantecedentsoofotheobail-applicant,oroleoascribedotoohim,o andotheonatureoofooffenceoareorequiredotoobeodelvedointo.oo However,o theo involvemento ofo bail-applicanto ino anothero NDPS/othero offenceo cannoto ipsoo factoo resulto ino theo conclusionoofohisopropensityoforocommittingooffenceoinotheo future.o o

(iii)o Theo bail-Courto may,o ato theo timeo ofo grantingo bail,o imposeo upono theo applicant-accusedo ao conditiono thato heo wouldosubmit,oatosuchoregularotimeoperiod/intervaloasomayo stipulatedo byo theo Courto grantingo bail,o ano affidavito beforeo concernedo Specialo Judgeo ofo NDPSo Court/Illaqao (Jurisdictional)o Judicialo Magistrate/concernedo Policeo Station,o too theo effecto thato heo haso noto beeno involvedo ino commissionoofoanyooffenceoafterobeingoreleasedoonobail.ooIno theofactsoofoaogivenocase,oimpositionoofosuchoconditionomayo beoconsideredotoobeosufficientoforosatisfactionoofoconditiono enumeratedoinoSectiono37(1)(b)(ii).ooo o VI.oo Thereoisonoogainsayingothatotheonature,omodeoandoextentoofoexerciseo ofo powero byo ao Court;o whileo satisfyingo itselfo regardingo theo conditionso stipulatedo ino Sectiono 37o ofo NDPSo Act;o shallo dependo uponotheojudicialodiscretionoexercisedobyosuchoCourtoinotheofactso andocircumstancesoofoaogivenocase.oNooexhaustiveoguidelinesocano possiblyobeolaidodownoasotoowhatowouldoconstituteoparametersoforo satisfactionooforequirementounderoSectiono37o(ibid)oasoeveryocaseo

o o 6o o o hasoitsoownouniqueofacts/circumstances.ooMakingosuchoanoattemptoiso nothingobutoaoutopianoendeavour.ooErgo,othisoissueoisobestoleftotootheo judicialo wisdomo ando discretiono ofo theo Courto dealingo witho sucho matter."o o

6.3.o o Inothisoviewoofotheomatter,otheorigoroimposedounderoSectiono37o ofotheoNDPSoActostandsodiluted.oo

6.4.o o Theopetitioneroisoaoladyoagedoabouto54oyearso(asoperomemooofo parties),ohence,obailopetitionooughtotoobeoconsideredoinoviewoofoprovisootoo Sectiono480(2)oBNSS.oItoisopertinentotoomentionohereinothatotheoprovisootoo Sectiono 480o BNSS,o 2023,o iso pario materiao witho provisoo too Sectiono 437o Cr.P.C.,o 1973.o Ino thiso regard,o ito wouldo beo appositeo too refero hereino too ao judgmentopassedobyothisoCourtoono14.03.2024oinoCRM-M-11503-2024otitledo aso'RavinderoKauroVs.oStateoofoPunjab'o(dealingowithoprovisootooSectiono437o Cr.P.C.),orelevantothereoforeadsoasounder:o "Itowouldobeoappositeotooreferohereinotootheodictaoofoaojudgmentoofotheo Hon'bleoSupremeoCourtoinoaocaseoofo'SatenderoKumaroAntiloVs.oCentralo BureauoofoInvestigationo&oAnr.,o2022(10)oSCCo51'o,owhichoheldoasounder:o

51.oo Provisoo too Sectiono 437o ofo theo Codeo mandateso thato wheno theo accusedoisounderotheoageoofosixteenoyears,osickooroinfirmoorobeingoaowoman,o isosomethingowhichoisorequiredotoobeotakenonoteoof.oObviously,otheocourto hasotoosatisfyoitselfothatotheoaccusedopersonoisosickooroinfirm.oInoaocaseo pertainingotoowomen,otheocourtoisoexpectedotooshowosomeosensitivity.oWeo haveo alreadyo takeno noteo ofo theo facto thato manyo womeno whoo commito cognizableo offenseso areo pooro ando illiterate.o Ino manyo cases,o upono beingo youngotheyohaveochildrenotootakeocareoof,oandothereoareomanyoinstanceso whenotheochildrenoareotooliveoinoprisons.oTheostatisticsowouldoshowothato moreothano1000ochildrenoareolivingoinoprisonsoalongowithotheiromothers.o Thisoisoanoaspectothatotheocourtsoareoexpectedotootakeonoteoofoasoitowouldonoto onlyoinvolveotheointerestoofotheoaccused,obutoalsootheochildrenowhooareonoto expectedotoogetoexposedotootheoprisons.oThereoisoaograveodangeroofotheiro beingoinheritedonotoonlyowithopovertyobutowithocrimeoasowell.o xxxxoo o o xxxxoo o o xxxo

58.oo Sectiono437oofotheoCodeoempowersotheoMagistrateotoodealowithoallo theooffensesowhileoconsideringoanoapplicationoforobailowithotheoexceptionoofo ano offenseo punishableo eithero witho lifeo imprisonmento oro deatho triableo exclusivelyobyotheoCourtoofoSessions.oTheofirstoprovisoofacilitatesoaocourtotoo conditionallyoreleaseoonobailoanoaccusedoifoheoisounderotheoageoofo16oyearso oro iso ao womano oro iso sicko oro infirm,o aso discussedo earlier.o Thiso beingo ao welfareo legislation,o thougho introducedo byo wayo ofo ao proviso,o haso too beo appliedowhileoconsideringoreleaseoonobailoeitherobyotheoCourtoofoSessionsooro theoHighoCourt,oasotheocaseomayobe.oTheopowerounderoSectiono439oofotheo Codeoisoexercisedoagainstoanoorderorejectingoanoapplicationoforobailoando

o o 7o o o againstoanooffenceoexclusivelyodecidedobyotheoCourtoofoSessions.oThereo cannotobeoaodividedoapplicationoofoprovisootooSectiono437,owhileoexercisingo theopowerounderoSectiono439.oWhileodealingowithoaowelfareolegislation,oao purposiveointerpretationogivingotheobenefitotootheoneedyopersonobeingotheo intendmentoisotheoroleorequiredotoobeoplayedobyotheocourt.oWeodoonotowisho toostateothatothisoprovisoohasotoobeoconsideredofavourablyoinoallocasesoasotheo applicationodependsouponotheofactsoandocircumstancesocontainedotherein.o Whatoisorequiredoisotheoconsiderationoperoseobyotheocourtoofothisoprovisoo amongootherofactors."o o

7.o o Asoperocustodyocertificateodatedo17.11.2025ofiledobyotheolearnedo Stateocounsel,otheopetitionerohasoalreadyosufferedoincarcerationoforoaoperiodo ofo04omonthsoando09odays.oFurther,oasoperotheosaidocustodyocertificate,otheo petitioneroiso statedo toobeoinvolvedoinoothero FIR(s).o However,o thiso factumo cannotobeoaogroundosufficientobyoitself,otoodeclineotheoconcessionooforegularo bailotootheopetitioneroinotheoFIRoinoquestionowhenoaocaseoisomadeooutoforogranto ofo regularo bailo quao theo FIRo ino questiono byo ratiocinatingo upono theo facts/circumstancesoofotheosaidoFIR.oRelianceoinothisoregardocanobeoplacedo uponotheojudgmentoofotheoHon'bleoSupremeoCourtoinoMaulanaoMohd.oAmiro Rashadio v.o Stateo ofo U.P.o ando another,o 2012o (1)o RCRo (Criminal)o 586;o ao DivisionoBenchojudgmentoofotheoHon'bleoCalcuttaoHighoCourtoinocaseoofo SridharoDasov.oState,o1998o(2)oRCRo(Criminal)o477o&ojudgmentsoofothisoSridharoDasov.oState,o1998o(2)oRCRo(Criminal)o477 Courto ino CRM-Mo No.38822-2022o titledo aso Akhilesho Singho v.o Stateo ofo Haryana,odecidedoono29.11.2021,oandoBalrajov.oStateoofoHaryana,o1998o(3)o RCRo(Criminal)o191.oo o o Sufficeo too say,o furthero detentiono ofo theo petitionero aso ano undertrialoisonotowarrantedoinotheofactsoandocircumstancesoofotheocase.oo

8.o o Inoviewoofoabove,otheopresentopetitionoisoallowed.oPetitioneroiso orderedotoobeoreleasedoonoregularobailoonoherofurnishingobail/suretyobondsotoo theosatisfactionoofotheoLd.oconcernedotrialoCourt/DutyoMagistrate.oHowever,o

o o 8o o o ino additiono too conditionso thato mayo beo imposedo byo theo concernedo trialo Court/DutyoMagistrate,otheopetitioneroshalloremainoboundobyotheofollowingo conditions:oo

(i)o Theopetitioneroshallonotomis-useotheolibertyogranted.oo

(ii)oo Theopetitioneroshallonototamperowithoanyoevidence,ooralooro documentary,oduringotheotrial.oo

(iii)oo Theopetitioneroshallonotoabsentoherselfoonoanyodateobeforeo theotrial.oo

(iv)oo Theo petitionero shallo noto commito anyo offenceo whileo ono bail.oo

(v)oo Theopetitioneroshallodepositoheropassport,oifoany,owithotheo trialoCourt.oo

(vi)o Theo petitionero shallo giveo hero cellphoneo numbero too theo Investigatingo Officer/SHOo ofo concernedo Policeo Stationo andoshallonotochangeoherocell-phoneonumberowithoutoprioro permissionoofotheotrialoCourt/IllaqaoMagistrate.oo

(vii)o Theopetitioneroshallonotoinoanyomannerotryotoodelayotheo trial.oo

(viii)o Theopetitioneroshallosubmit,oonotheofirstoworkingodayoofo everyo month,o ano affidavit,o beforeo theo concernedo trialo Court,o too theo effecto thato sheo haso noto beeno involvedo ino commissionoofoanyooffenceoafterobeingoreleasedoonobail.o Ino caseo theo petitionero iso foundo too beo involvedo ino anyo offenceoafteroherobeingoenlargedoonobailoinotheopresento FIR,oonotheobasisoofoheroaffidavitoorootherwise,otheoStateoiso mandatedotoomove,oforthwith,oforocancellationoofoherobailo whicho plea,o buto ofo course,o shallo beo ratiocinatedo upono meritsothereof.oo o

9.o o Inocaseoofobreachoofoanyoofotheoaforesaidoconditionsoandothoseo whichomayobeoimposedobyoconcernedotrialoCourt/DutyoMagistrateoasodirectedo hereinaboveo oro upono showingo anyo othero sufficiento cause,o theo State/complainanto shallo beo ato libertyo too moveo cancellationo ofo bailo ofo theo petitioner.oo

10.oo o Orderedoaccordingly.oo

11.o o Nothingosaidohereinaboveoshallobeoconstruedoasoanoexpressionoofo opinionoonotheomeritsoofotheocase.oo

o o 9o o o

12.oo o Sinceotheomainocaseohasobeenodecided,opendingomiscellaneouso application,oifoany,oshalloalsoostandsodisposedooff.oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ooo o oooooooo(SUMEEToGOEL)o o o o o o o o o ooooooJUDGEo Novembero18,o2025oo mahavirooo o o Whetherospeaking/reasoned:o o Yes/Noo o Whetheroreportable:o o o Yes/Noo

o o

Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.