VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Punjab and Haryana High Court 2025 › High Court of Punjab and Haryana

Lovejit Singh @ Lala v. State of Punjab

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Decided
1 September 2025
Bench
Sumeet Goelauthor
Case no.
CRM-M 48502/2025

Judgment

o o o o o o o o 1o o o 110o INoTHEoHIGHoCOURToOFoPUNJABoANDoHARYANAoATo CHANDIGARHo o o o CRM-M-48502-2025o o o Dateoofodecision:oSeptembero01,o2025o o LovejitoSingho@oLalaoo o o o o o o o o o ....Petitionero versuso o StateoofoPunjaboo o o o o o o o o o ....Respondento o CORAM:oo HON'BLEoMR.oJUSTICEoSUMEEToGOELo o Present:oo Ms.oSamanpreetoKaur,oAdvocateoforotheopetitioner.oo o o o Mr.oGurpartapoSinghoBhullar,oAAGoPunjab.oo o *****o SUMEEToGOEL,oJ.o(Oral)oo o

1.o o PresentopetitionohasobeenofiledounderoSectiono482oofoBharatiyao NagarikoSurakshaoSanhita,o2023o(hereinafterotoobeoreferredoaso'theoBNSS')o forograntoofopre-arrest/anticipatoryobailotootheopetitioneroinocaseobearingoFIRo No.46o datedo 15.05.2025,o registeredo foro theo offenceso punishableo undero Sectionso115(2),o118(2),o3(5)oofotheoBNSoAct,oatoPoliceoStationoChattiiwind,o DistrictoAmritsaroRural.ooo

2.oo o TheogravamenoofotheoFIRoinoquestionoreflectsothatotheopresento caseowasoregisteredoonotheobasisoofoaostatementomadeobyoCharanjitoSingh,oS/oo LaloSinghoR/ooRajewal,oagedoabouto52oyears,owhooisoworkingoasofarmer.o Accordingotootheocomplainant,oono03.05.2025oatoabouto09:30oPM,oheowentotoo theohouseoofohisomaternaloauntonamelyoBiroKauroinovillageoRajewalotooinviteo hero foro theo roofo layingo ceremonyo ofo hiso houseo scheduledoono04.05.2025.oo o o o o o o o o 2o o Whenotheocomplainantowasostandingooutsideotheohouseoofoheromaternaloaunto afteroknockingotheodoor,oatothatotimeoaccused/opetitioneroarmedowithodatar;o GurpreetoSinghoarmedowithobaseballobat;oVanshdeepoSingho@oKakaoarmedo withodaangoalongwithotwoounknownopersons,owhoowereoarmedowithobaseballo batoandodaangoapproachedohim.ooTheopetitioneroraisedoaolalkaraosayingothato theocomplainantobeotaughtoaolessonoforonotoallowingothemotooencroachoupono theogovernmentoland.ooTheosaidoaccusedoattackedotheocomplainantowithodataro whichohitoonohisonoseocausingohimotoofall.ooAccusedoGurpeetoSinghostruckotheo complainanto ono theo backo ofo hiso heado witho ao baseballo bat.o o Accusedo Vanshdeepo Singho hito theo complainanto ono theo waisto witho ao daang.o o o Theo unknownoassailantsoalsooattackedotheocomplainantoonotheowaistoandorightoleg.oo Onoraisingotheohueoandocry,otheoaccusedofledowithotheirorespectiveoweapons.oo Whenotheofamilyoofotheocomplainantoreachedotheospot,otheocomplainantowaso takenotooCiviloHospital,oManawala.ooDueotootheoseriousnessoofotheoinjures,oheo waso referredo too Guruo Nanako Devo Hospital,o Amritsaro whereo heo remainedo underotreatmentountilo06.05.2025oandothereafterowasoagainoadmittedotooCivilo Hospital,oManawalaotillo09.05.2025.oBasedoonotheseosetoofoallegations,otheo instantoFIRowasodulyoregisteredoandoinvestigationoensued.oo

3.o o Learnedo counselo foro theo petitionero haso iteratedo thato ao bareo perusaloofotheoFIRoitselfoshowsothatoallegationsoleveledoagainstotheopetitionero areoconcocted,oimprobableoandodevoidoofoanyomerit.ooLearnedocounselohaso furtheroiteratedothatoasoperotheoprosecution,oaodataroblowowasoattributedotootheo petitioner,obutonarrationoofotheoeventsoinotheoFIRoisoinconsistentoandodoesonoto inspireoconfidence.oFurthermore,othereoisounexplainedodelayoofo12odaysoino lodgingoofotheoFIRoasotheoallegedoincidentotookoplaceoono03.05.2025owhereaso theo FIRo ino questiono waso registeredo onlyo ono 15.05.2025.o o Thiso inordinateoMAHAVIR SINGH o o o o o o o o 3o o delayoclearlyopointsotowardsoafterthought.ooAccordingotoolearnedocounsel,oifo theostoryoofotheoprosecutionoisoassumedotoobeotrueoforotheosakeoofoarguments,o theoinjuryoallegedlyoattributedotootheopetitioneroisoonoaonon-vitalopartoofotheo bodyoofotheocomplainant.ooThus,otheoessentialoingredientsoofoaograveooffenceo areomissing.ooLearnedocounseloassertsothatotheopoliceohaveonotoconductedoao fairoandoimpartialoinvestigationoandotheoinquiryoconductedosoofaroisonotoonlyo incompleteobutoalsootaintedowithobias.oLearnedocounselohasofurtheroarguedo thatoco-accused,onamely,oVanshdeepoSinghoaliasoKakaohasobeenograntedotheo concessionoofoanticipatoryobailobyotheoco-ordinateoBenchoofothisoCourtovideo orderodatedo04.08.2025opassedoinoCRM-M-39021-2025.ooItoisonextosubmittedo byotheolearnedocounselothatotheopetitioneroisoaoyoungomanoofo29oyearsoandohiso entireofutureowouldobeojeopardizedoifoheoisosubjectedotooincarcerationoinoao falseocase.ooMoreover,otheocustodialointerrogationoshouldonotobeousedoasoao punitiveo measureo ando iso justifiedo onlyo wheno absolutelyo necessaryo foro theo recoveryoofomaterialoevidence.oFurthermore,otheopetitioneroisoreadyotoojoino theoinvestigationoandohenceonoousefulopurposeowouldobeoservedobyosendingo himobehindotheobars.oOnotheoaforesaidosubmissions,otheograntoofoanticipatoryo bailoisoentreatedofor.oo

4.o o Pero contra,o learnedo Stateo counselo haso opposedo theo granto ofo anticipatoryobailotootheopetitionerobyoarguingothatotheooffenceocommittedobyo theopetitioneroisoseriousoinonature.ooLearnedoStateocounselohasoiteratedothato thereo areo specifico ando directo allegationso againsto theo petitionero whicho areo supportedobyomedicaloevidence.ooTheocomplainantohasospecificallyonamedotheo petitioneroalongwithoco-accusedoandoclearlyoattributedotheoroleoofoinflictingoao blowowithoaodataroonohisonose.ooFurthermore,otheoinjuriesosustainedobyotheo complainanto areo neithero superficialo noro fabricatedo aso iso evidento fromo theoMAHAVIR SINGH o o o o o o o o 4o o medicaloevidence.oGivenotheoseverityoofotheooffence,othereoexistsoaosubstantialo likelihoodothatotheopetitioneromayoabscondoorotamperowithotheoevidenceoifoheo iso enlargedo ono bail.o o Furthermore,o custodialo interrogationo ofo theo presento petitioneroisoessentialotooascertainotheoidentitiesoandorolesoofootheroco-accusedo whoowereoalsooinvolvedoinotheocommissionoofotheooffenceoandowereopresento atotheosceneoofotheooccurrence.oo

5.o o Iohaveoheardotheolearnedocounseloforotheorivalopartiesoandohaveo goneothroughotheoavailableorecordoofotheocase.o

6.o o Ito wouldo beo appositeo too refero hereino too ao judgmento ofo theo Hon'bleo Supremeo Courto titledo aso Kishoro Vishwasraoo Patilo vs.o Deepako Yashwanto Patilo ando anothero passedo ino SLP(Crl)o No.1125-2022,o relevanto whereoforeadsoasounder:o o "74.o Ordinarily,o arresto iso ao parto ofo theo processo ofo theo investigationointendedotoosecureoseveralopurposes.oThereomayobeo circumstancesoinowhichotheoaccusedomayoprovideoinformationo leadingotoodiscoveryoofomaterialofactsoandorelevantoinformation.o Grantoofoanticipatoryobailomayohamperotheoinvestigation.oPre-arrestobailoisotoostrikeoaobalanceobetweenotheoindividual'sorightotoo personalofreedomoandotheorightoofotheoinvestigatingoagencyotoo interrogateotheoaccusedoasotootheomaterialosoofarocollectedoandotoo collecto moreo informationo whicho mayo leado too recoveryo ofo relevantoinformation.oo o xxxo o o xxxo o o xxxo o o xxxo o xxxo o o xxxo o o xxxo o o xxxo o o 75.o Observingo thato theo arresto iso ao parto ofo theo investigationo intendedo too secureo severalo purposes,o ino Adrio Dharano Daso v.o StateoofoW.B.o[AdrioDharanoDasov.oStateoofoW.B.,o(2005)o4oSCCo 303o:o2005oSCCo(Cri)o933]o,oitowasoheldoasoundero:o(SCCop.o313,o parao19)oo o o o o o o o o 5o o o "19.oOrdinarily,oarrestoisoaopartoofotheoprocessoofoinvestigationo intendedotoosecureoseveralopurposes.oTheoaccusedomayohaveotoo beo questionedo ino detailo regardingo variouso facetso ofo motive,o preparation,o commissiono ando aftermatho ofo theo crimeo ando theo connectionoofootheropersons,oifoany,oinotheocrime.oThereomayobeo circumstancesoinowhichotheoaccusedomayoprovideoinformationo leadingotoodiscoveryoofomaterialofacts.oItomayobeonecessaryotoo curtailo hiso freedomo ino ordero too enableo theo investigationo too proceedowithoutohindranceoandotooprotectowitnessesoandopersonso connectedo witho theo victimo ofo theo crime,o too prevento hiso disappearance,otoomaintainolawoandoorderoinotheolocality.oForo theseoorootheroreasons,oarrestomayobecomeoanoinevitableopartoofo theoprocessoofoinvestigation.oTheolegalityoofotheoproposedoarresto cannotobeogoneointooinoanoapplicationounderoSectiono438oofotheo Code.o Theo roleo ofo theo investigatoro iso wello definedo ando theo jurisdictionaloscopeoofointerferenceobyotheocourtoinotheoprocesso ofo investigationo iso limited.o Theo courto ordinarilyo willo noto interfereowithotheoinvestigationoofoaocrimeoorowithotheoarrestoofo theo accusedo ino ao cognizableo offence.o Ano interimo ordero restrainingoarrest,oifopassedowhileodealingowithoanoapplicationo underoSectiono438oofotheoCodeowilloamountotoointerferenceoino theo investigation,o whicho cannot,o ato anyo rate,o beo doneo underoSectiono438oofotheoCode."o o 76.oInoSiddharamoSatlingappaoMhetreov.oStateoofoMaharashtrao [SiddharamoSatlingappaoMhetreov.oStateoofoMaharashtra,o(2011)o 1oSCCo694o:o(2011)o1oSCCo(Cri)o514],otheoSupremeoCourtolaido downotheofactorsoandoparametersotoobeoconsideredowhileodealingo withoanticipatoryobail.oItowasoheldothatotheonatureoandotheogravityo ofo theo accusationo ando theo exacto roleoofotheoaccusedo mustobeo properlyocomprehendedobeforeoarrestoisomadeoandothatotheocourto mustoevaluateotheoavailableomaterialoagainstotheoaccusedoveryo carefully.oItowasoalsooheldothatotheocourtoshouldoalsooconsidero whetherotheoaccusationsohaveobeenomadeoonlyowithotheoobjectoofo injuringoorohumiliatingotheoapplicantobyoarrestingohimooroher.o o o o o o o o o 6o o o 77.o Aftero referringo tooSiddharamo Satlingappao Mhetreo [SiddharamoSatlingappaoMhetreov.oStateoofoMaharashtra,o(2011)o 1oSCCo694o:o(2011)o1oSCCo(Cri)o514]oandootherojudgmentsoando observingo thato anticipatoryo bailo cano beo grantedo onlyo ino exceptionalo circumstances,o inoJaio Prakasho Singho v.o Stateo ofo Biharo[JaioPrakashoSinghov.oStateoofoBihar,o(2012)o4oSCCo379o:o

(2012)o2oSCCo(Cri)o468]o,otheoSupremeoCourtoheldoasoundero:o(2012)o2oSCCo(Cri)o468] (SCCop.o386,oparao19)oo o "19.o Parameterso foro granto ofo anticipatoryo bailo ino ao seriouso offenceoareorequiredotoobeosatisfiedoandofurtherowhileograntingo sucho relief,o theo courto musto recordo theo reasonso therefor.o Anticipatoryo bailo cano beo grantedo onlyo ino exceptionalo circumstancesowhereotheocourtoisoprimaofacieoofotheoviewothato theoapplicantohasofalselyobeenoenropedoinotheocrimeoandowouldo noto misuseo hiso liberty.o (SeeoD.K.o Ganesho Babuo v.o P.T.o Manokarano[D.K.oGaneshoBabuov.oP.T.oManokaran,o(2007)o4o SCCo434o:(2007)o2oSCCo(Cri)o345]o,oStateoofoMaharashtraov.o Mohd.oSajidoHusainoMohd.oS.oHusaino[StateoofoMaharashtraov.o Mohd.o Sajido Husaino Mohd.o S.o Husain,o (2008)o 1o SCCo 213o :o

(2008)o1oSCCo(Cri)o176]oandoUnionoofoIndiaov.oPadamoNaraino Aggarwalo[UnionoofoIndiaov.oPadamoNarainoAggarwal,o(2008)oAggarwalo[UnionoofoIndiaov.oPadamoNarainoAggarwal,o(2008)o 13oSCCo305o:o(2009)o1oSCCo(Cri)o1]o.)"o o Economicooffenceso o 78.o Powero underoSectiono 438oCrPCo beingo ano extraordinaryo remedy,o haso too beo exercisedo sparingly;o moreo so,o ino caseso ofo economico offences.o Economico offenceso stando aso ao differento classo aso theyo affecto theo economico fabrico ofo theo society.oInoDirectorateo ofo Enforcemento v.o Ashoko Kumaro Jaino [Directorateo ofo Enforcementov.o Ashoko Kumaro Jain,o (1998)o 2oSCCo105o:o1998oSCCo(Cri)o510],oitowasoheldothatoinoeconomico offences,otheoaccusedoisonotoentitledotooanticipatoryobail."o o 15.oInoSushilaoAgrawaloandoothersov.oStateo(NCToofoDelhi)oando Anotheroreportedoino(2020)o5oSCCo1,oConstitutionoBenchoofothiso Courtoheldothatowhileoconsideringoanoapplicationoforograntoofo o o o o o o o o 7o o pre-arresto bailo theo Courto haso too considero theo natureo ofo theo offence,otheoroleoofotheoperson,otheolikelihoodoofohisoinfluencingo theo courseo ofo investigation,o oro tamperingo witho evidenceo oro likelihoodoofofleeingojustice.oTheoCourtoheld:-o o "92.4.o Courtso oughto too beo generallyo guidedo byo considerationso sucho aso theo natureo ando gravityo ofo theo offences,otheoroleoattributedotootheoapplicant,oandotheofactso ofo theo case,o whileo consideringo whethero too granto anticipatoryobail,oororefuseoit.oWhetherotoograntooronotoisoao matteroofodiscretion;oequallyowhetheroandoifoso,owhatokindo ofospecialoconditionsoareotoobeoimposedo(oronotoimposed)o areo dependento ono factso ofo theo case,o ando subjecto too theo discretionoofotheocourt."o o

7.o o AsoperotheocaseoputoforthoinotheoFIRoinoquestion,oindubitably,o seriouso allegationso haveo beeno levelledo againsto theo petitioner.o Aso pero theo versionoputoforthobyotheoprosecution,oonotheoallegedodayoofooccurrence,otheo petitioner,o alongwitho co-accused,o allegedlyo formedo ano unlawfulo assemblyo andoarmedowithodeadlyoweaponsolaunchedoaoviolentoandopremeditatedoassaulto onotheoinjured.oTheoallegationsoagainstotheopetitioneroareospecificoandodirect.oo Theopetitioneroisostatedotoohaveoattackedotheocomplainantowithoaosharpoedgedo weapono(datar),oonohisonoseowhichocannotobeotermedoasoaosimpleoinjury.ooTheo delayoinoregistrationoofotheoFIRostandsoreasonablyoexplainedoinoviewoofotheo medicaloconditionoofotheocomplainant,owhoowereounderotreatmentoinodifferento hospitals.o Theo incidento doeso noto merelyo reflecto ao physicalo assaulto buto amountso too ao targetedo ando premeditatedo acto ofo aggressiono againsto theo petitioner.ooo

7.1.o o Indubitably,o theo co-accused,o namely,o Vanshdeepo Singho aliaso Kakaohasobeenograntedoconcessionoofoanticipatoryobailobyotheoco-ordinateo o o o o o o o o 8o o BenchoofothisoCourt,obutotheosaidoco-accusedowasoattributedosimpleoinjuryo whereas,otheopresentopetitionerohasobeenoattributedogrievousoinjury.oErgo,otheo petitionerocannotobeosaidotoobeoatoparityowithothatoco-accused,o&ohence,otheo benefito ofo factumo ofo co-accusedo havingo beeno extendedo concessiono ofo anticipatoryobailocannotobeoaffordedotootheopresentopetitioner.oo

8.o o TheopetitionerohasobeenospecificallyonamedoinotheoFIR,oandotheo natureoofotheoinjuriesoattributedotoohimoisoseriousoreflectingotheoseverityoofotheo allegedoact.oNoocauseonayoplausibleocauseohasobeenoshown,oatothisostage,ofromo whichoitocanobeodecipheredothatotheopetitionerohasobeenofalselyoimplicatedo intootheo presento FIR.o Ito goeso withouto sayingo thatoino theo instanto case,o theo complainanto haso categoricallyo statedo thato theo petitionero alongo witho co-accusedoandoasopartoofoanounlawfuloassembly,oactedoinofurtheranceoofotheiro commonoobjectotooinflictomultipleoinjuriesouponotheocomplainant.oo

9.o o Itoisobefittingotoomentionohereothatowhileoconsideringoaopleaoforo grantoofoanticipatoryobail,otheoCourtohasotooequilibrateobetweenosafeguardingo individualo rightso ando protectingo societalo interest(s).o Theo Courto oughto too reckonowithotheomagnitudeoandonatureoofotheooffence;otheoroleoattributedotoo theoaccused;otheoneedoforofairoandofreeoinvestigationoasoalsootheodeeperoando wideoimpactoofosuchoallegedoiniquitiesoonotheosociety.oItoisoimperativeothato everyopersonoinotheoSocietyocanoexpectoanoatmosphereofreeofromoforebodingo &ofearoofoanyotransgression.ooAtothisostage,othereoisonoomaterialoonorecordotoo holdo thato primao facieo caseo iso noto madeo outo againsto theo petitioner.o Theo materialowhichohasocomeoonorecordoandopreliminaryoinvestigation,oappearotoo beo establishedo ao reasonableo basiso foro theo accusations.o Thus,o ito iso noto appropriateotoograntoanticipatoryobailotootheopetitioner,oasoitowouldonecessarilyo causeo impedimento ino effectiveo investigation.o o InoStateo v.o Anilo SharmaoStateo v.o Anilo SharmaoMAHAVIR SINGH o o o o o o o o 9o o [Stateov.o Anilo Sharma,o (1997)o 7o SCCo 187o :o 1997o SCCo (Cri)o 1039],o theo SupremeoCourtoheldoasoundero:o(SCCop.o189,oparao6)oo o "6.o Weo findo forceo ino theo submissiono ofo CBIo thato custodialo interrogationo iso qualitativelyo moreo elicitation-orientedo thano questioningo ao suspecto whooiso well-ensconcedo witho ao favourableo orderounderoSectiono438oofotheoCode.oInoaocaseolikeothis,oeffectiveo interrogationoofoaosuspectedopersonoisoofotremendousoadvantageoino disinterringo manyo usefulo informationso ando alsoo materialso whicho wouldohaveobeenoconcealed.oSuccessoinosuchointerrogationowouldo eludeoifotheosuspectedopersonoknowsothatoheoisowelloprotectedoando insulatedo byo ao pre-arresto bailo ordero duringo theo timeo heo iso interrogated.oVeryooftenointerrogationoinosuchoaoconditionowouldo reduceo too ao mereo ritual.o Theo argumento thato theo custodialo interrogationo iso fraughto witho theo dangero ofo theo persono beingo subjectedotoothird-degreeomethodsoneedonotobeocountenanced,ofor,o suchoanoargumentocanobeoadvancedobyoalloaccusedoinoallocriminalo cases.oTheoCourtohasotoopresumeothatoresponsibleopoliceoofficerso wouldoconductothemselvesoinoaoresponsibleomanneroandothatothoseo entrustedowithotheotaskoofodisinterringooffencesowouldonotoconducto themselvesoasooffenders."o o

9.1.o o Inoviewoofotheoseriousnessoofotheoallegations,otheoroleoattributedo tootheopetitioneroofoinflictingoaodataroblowoonotheonoseoofotheocomplainant,o thisoCourtofindsonoocompellingogroundotooextendotheobenefitoofodiscretionaryo reliefotootheopetitioner.oGrantingobailoatothisostageowouldonotoonlyoundermineo theoadministrationoofojusticeobutomayoalsooemboldenotheoaccusedoandoposeoao threatotootheosafetyoandowell-beingoofotheovictimoandootherowitnesses.ooInoviewo ofotheogravityoofotheoallegations,otheospecificoroleoattributedotootheopetitioner,o theoseriousonatureoofoinjuriesosustainedobyotheocomplainantoandotheonecessityo ofocustodialointerrogationoforoaofairoandothoroughoinvestigation,othisoCourtoiso ofotheoconsideredoopinionothatotheopetitionerodoesonotodeserveotheoconcessionoMAHAVIR SINGH o o o o o o o o 10o o ofo anticipatoryo bailo ino theo factualo matrixo ofo theo caseoinohand.o Moreover,o custodialo interrogationo ofo theo petitionero iso necessaryo foro ano effectiveo investigationo&otoounravelotheotruth.oTheopetitionois,othus,odevoidoofomeritso andoisoherebyodismissed.o

10.o o Nothingosaidohereinaboveoshallobeodeemedotoobeoanoexpressiono ofoopinionouponomeritsoofotheocase/investigation.oo

11.o o Pendingoapplication(s),oifoany,oshalloalsoostandodisposedooff.oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooo(SUMEEToGOEL)o o o o o o o o o ooooJUDGEo Septembero01,o2025o mahaviroo Whetherospeaking/reasoned:o o Yes/Noo o Whetheroreportable:o o o Yes/Noo

Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.