VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Punjab and Haryana High Court 2025 › High Court of Punjab and Haryana

Joga Singh v. State of Punjab

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Decided
1 September 2025
Bench
Sumeet Goelauthor
Case no.
CRM-M 47284/2025

Judgment

o o o o o o o o 1o o o 103o(2ocases)o INoTHEoHIGHoCOURToOFoPUNJABoANDoHARYANAoATo CHANDIGARHo o o o o o o o Dateoofodecision:oSeptembero01,o2025o

1.o o CRM-M-47284-2025o o JogaoSinghoo o o o o o o o o o ....Petitionero versuso StateoofoPunjaboo o o o o o o o o o ....Respondento o

2.o o CRM-M-47337-2025o2. CRM 47337 2025 o SukhdevoSinghoo o o o o o o o o o ....Petitionero versuso StateoofoPunjaboo o o o o o o o o o ....Respondento o o CORAM:oo HON'BLEoMR.oJUSTICEoSUMEEToGOELo o Present:oo Mr.oHakamoSingh,oAdvocateoandoo o o Mr.oAjayoSinghoVirk,oAdvocateoforotheopetitioner(s).oo o o o Mr.oGurpartapoS.oBhullar,oAAGoPunjab.oo o o o Mr.oNamitoSharma,oAdvocateoforotheocomplainant.oo o *****o SUMEEToGOEL,oJ.o(ORAL)oo o

1.o o Byothisocommonoorder,otheoaforesaidotwoopetitionsoareobeingo disposedoof,oasotheyoemanateofromoaocommonoFIR.oo o o Foro brevity,o theo factso areo beingo takeno fromo CRM-M-47284-2025.oo

2.o oo Presento petitiono haso beeno filedo undero Sectiono 482o ofo theo BhartiyaoNagarikoSurakshaoSanhita,o2023o(foroshorto'BNSS')oforograntoofo o o o o o o o o 2o o concessionoofoanticipatoryobailotootheopetitioneroinocaseoFIRoNo.150odatedo

15.06.2025,ounderoSectionso333,o118(1),o115(2),o191(3),o190,o351(2),o329(3)o ando62oofotheoBharatiyaoNyayaoSanhita,o2023o(foroshorto'BNS')o(Sectionso 117(2),o118(2)oofoBNSoaddedolateroonovideorapatoNo.035odatedo21.06.2025),o registeredoatoPoliceoStationoCityoTarnoTaran,oDistrictoTarnoTaran.oo

3.oo o TheogravamenoofotheoFIRoinoquestionoreflectsothatotheopresento caseo waso registeredo ono theo basiso ofo ao statemento madeo byo Jagroopo Singho (complainant)o tootheo effecto thato heo waso havingooneoregisteredo ploto ofo28o marlas,osituatedoatotheomainoroadoofoBaleoChak.oOno05.05.2025,oSawindero Singh,o Dilbagho Singho sonso ofo Hario Singh,o Sukhdevo Singho (petitionero ino CRM-M-47337-2025),oBalwinderoSinghosonsoofoSawinderoSinghoandoJogao Singho (petitionero ino CRM-M-47284-2025)o sono ofo Dilbagho Singh,o allo residentsoofoBaleoChakohadotriedotootakeoillegalopossessionoofohisoaboveosaido plot.o Ino thiso respect,o theo complainanto hado movedo ao complainto ando consequently,otheomatterogotocompromisedobetweenothemoonotheoagreemento thatotillotheodecisionoofotheoownershipoofotheosaidoplot,ononeoofotheopartiesowillo raiseoconstructionoonoit.oHowever,oono15.06.2025oatoabouto05.30oa.m.,owheno theocomplainantowokeoupoinotheomorning,oheosawothatoaboveonamedoaccusedo personsowereoconstructingowallooverohisosaidoplotoandowhenotheyowereotriedo toobeostoppedoforodoingoso,otheoaccusedopersonsostartedopeltingostonesoupono him.oInoorderotoosaveohisolife,otheocomplainantorushedotowardsohisohouse,obuto allo theo accusedo personso chasedo himo ando forciblyo enteredo intoo hiso house.o AccusedoSukhdevoSingho(petitioneroinoCRM-M-47337-2025)oandoBalwindero Singhowereoarmedowithosickleo(datar),oSawinderoSinghowasoarmedowithospadeo

(kahi),oaccusedoJogaoSingho(petitioneroinoCRM-M-47284-2025)owasoarmedo o o o o o o o o 3o o withodangoandoDilbaghoSinghowasoemptyohanded.oDilbaghoSinghoexhortedotoo catchoholdoofohimoandotooteachohimoaolessonofromostoppingothemotooraiseo constructionoofowalloaroundotheoaforesaidoplot.oThen,oaccusedoSukhdevoSingho (petitionero ino CRM-M-47337-2025)o gaveo dataro blowo too theo complainant,o whichohitouponohisorightoelbow.oAccusedoBalwinderoSinghogaveodataroblowotoo hisoleftolegobelowotheoleftoknee.oAfterothat,oaccusedoJogaoSingho(petitioneroino CRM-M-47284-2025)o ando Sawindero Singho gaveo beatingso too hiso father,oCRM 47284 2025 namely,o Hardeepo Singh.o Theyo raisedo hueo ando cry.o Upono which,o allo theo accusedopersonsowhileohurlingothreatsoofokillingothemofledoawayofromotheo spotowithotheirorespectiveoweapons,oandowhileotheyowereoleavingohouseoofotheo complainant,otheyoalsoohitohisomother,onamely,oInderjitoKauroandohisowife,o namely,ooSukhwinderoKaur.oTheocomplainantoalongwithowithohisofatherogoto admittedotooCiviloHospitaloTarnoTaran.oBasedoonothisostatement,otheoinstanto FIRowasodulyoregisteredoandoinvestigationoensued.oo

4.o o Learnedo counselo foro theo petitioner(s)o haso iteratedo thato theo petitioner(s)ohaveobeenofalselyoimplicatedointootheoFIRoinoquestion.oLearnedo counselohasofurtheroiteratedothatonoospecificoinjuryohasobeenoattributedotootheo petitioner(s).oLearnedocounselohasoiteratedothatotheoallegedoinjuriesosustainedo tootheocomplainantoappearotoobeoself-inflicted,oandoaomaliciousoeffortohaso beenomadeotoofalselyoimplicateotheopetitioner(s)ointootheoFIRoinoquestion.oo Learnedocounselohasofurtheroarguedothat,oonotheootherohand,otheopetitioner(s)o themselvesohaveosustainedoinjuriesoandoareoalsootheovictimsoinotheooccurrenceo inoquestion.oLearnedocounselofurtherosubmittedothatotheodisputeoinoquestionoiso civilo ino nature,o whicho escalatedo intoo ao mutualo altercationo rathero thano ao premeditatedocriminaloassault.oLearnedocounseloassertsothatotheopoliceohasonoto o o o o o o o o 4o o conductedoaofairoandoimpartialoinvestigationoandotheoinquiryoconductedosoofaro isonotoonlyoincompleteobutoalsootaintedowithobias.oFurthermore,otheopetitionerso areoreadyotoojoinotheoinvestigationoandohence,onoousefulopurposeowouldobeo servedobyosendingothemobehindotheobars.oItoisolastlyosubmittedobyotheolearnedo counselothatotheopresentopetitionsobeoallowedoandotheopetitionersobeograntedo theoconcessionoofotheoanticipatoryobail.ooo

5.o o Pero contra,o learnedo Stateo counselo haso opposedo theo granto ofo anticipatoryobailotootheopetitionersobyoarguingothatotheooffenceocommittedobyo theopetitionersoisoseriousoinonature.ooLearnedoStateocounselohasoiteratedothato theocustodialointerrogationoofotheopetitionersoisoimperativeoforotheopurposeoofo effectiveo ando fairo investigation,o particularlyo ino viewo ofo theo facto thato theo weaponsoofooffenceoareoyetotoobeorecoveredofromotheopetitioners.oLearnedo Stateocounselohasofurtherosubmittedothat,oinocaseotheopetitionersoareograntedo theo concessiono ofo pre-arrest,o ato thiso stage,o ito mayo impedeo theo ongoingo investigation,oobstructo recoveryo ando adverselyo effecto effortsotooapprehendo remainingoco-accused.oGivenotheoseverityoofotheooffenceoandotheoexistingo enmityo betweeno theo parties,o thereo existso ao substantialo likelihoodo thato theo petitionersomayoabscondoorotamperowithotheoevidenceoifotheyoareoenlargedoono bail.ooOnotheostrengthoofotheseosubmissions,odismissaloofoanticipatoryobailotoo theopetitionersoisoentreatedofor.oo

6.o o Learnedo counselo foro theo complainanto appearso ando fileso hiso vakalatnama(s),owhichoareotakenoonorecord.oHeohasovociferouslyoopposedotheo grantoofoanticipatoryobailotootheopetitionersobyoraisingosubmissionoinotandemo o o o o o o o o 5o o

7.o o Iohaveoheardotheolearnedocounseloforotheorivalopartiesoandohaveo goneothroughotheoavailableorecordoofotheocase.o

8.o o Ito wouldo beo appositeo too refero hereino too ao judgmento ofo theo Hon'bleo Supremeo Courto titledo aso Kishoro Vishwasraoo Patilo vs.o Deepako Yashwanto Patilo ando anothero passedo ino SLP(Crl)o No.1125-2022,o relevanto whereoforeadsoasounder:o o "74.oOrdinarily,oarrestoisoaopartoofotheoprocessoofotheoinvestigationointendedo too secureo severalo purposes.o Thereo mayo beo circumstanceso ino whicho theo accusedomayoprovideoinformationoleadingotoodiscoveryoofomaterialofactso ando relevanto information.o Granto ofo anticipatoryo bailo mayo hampero theo investigation.oPre-arrestobailoisotoostrikeoaobalanceobetweenotheoindividual'so righto too personalo freedomo ando theo righto ofo theo investigatingo agencyo too interrogateotheoaccusedoasotootheomaterialosoofarocollectedoandotoocollecto moreoinformationowhichomayoleadotoorecoveryooforelevantoinformation.oo o xxxo o o xxxo o o xxxo o o xxxo o xxxo o o xxxo o o xxxo o o xxxo o o 75.o Observingo thato theo arresto iso ao parto ofo theo investigationo intendedo too secureo severalo purposes,o ino Adrio Dharano Daso v.o Stateo ofo W.B.o [Adrio DharanoDasov.oStateoofoW.B.,o(2005)o4oSCCo303o:o2005oSCCo(Cri)o933]o,oitoDharanoDasov.oStateoofoW.B.,o(2005)o4oSCCo303o:o2005oSCCo(Cri)o933] wasoheldoasoundero:o(SCCop.o313,oparao19)oo o "19.oOrdinarily,oarrestoisoaopartoofotheoprocessoofoinvestigationointendedotoo secureoseveralopurposes.oTheoaccusedomayohaveotoobeoquestionedoinodetailo regardingovariousofacetsoofomotive,opreparation,ocommissionoandoaftermatho ofotheocrimeoandotheoconnectionoofootheropersons,oifoany,oinotheocrime.o Thereo mayo beo circumstanceso ino whicho theo accusedo mayo provideo informationoleadingotoodiscoveryoofomaterialofacts.oItomayobeonecessaryotoo curtailohisofreedomoinoorderotooenableotheoinvestigationotooproceedowithouto hindranceoandotooprotectowitnessesoandopersonsoconnectedowithotheovictimo ofotheocrime,otoopreventohisodisappearance,otoomaintainolawoandoorderoinotheo locality.oForotheseoorootheroreasons,oarrestomayobecomeoanoinevitableoparto ofotheoprocessoofoinvestigation.oTheolegalityoofotheoproposedoarrestocannoto beogoneointooinoanoapplicationounderoSectiono438oofotheoCode.oTheoroleoofo theoinvestigatoroisowellodefinedoandotheojurisdictionaloscopeoofointerferenceo byotheocourtoinotheoprocessoofoinvestigationoisolimited.oTheocourtoordinarilyo willonotointerfereowithotheoinvestigationoofoaocrimeoorowithotheoarrestoofotheo accusedoinoaocognizableooffence.oAnointerimoorderorestrainingoarrest,oifo passedowhileodealingowithoanoapplicationounderoSectiono438oofotheoCodeo willoamountotoointerferenceoinotheoinvestigation,owhichocannot,oatoanyorate,o beodoneounderoSectiono438oofotheoCode."o o 76.oInoSiddharamoSatlingappaoMhetreov.oStateoofoMaharashtrao[Siddharamo SatlingappaoMhetreov.oStateoofoMaharashtra,o(2011)o1oSCCo694o:o(2011)o1o SCCo(Cri)o514],otheoSupremeoCourtolaidodownotheofactorsoandoparameterso toobeoconsideredowhileodealingowithoanticipatoryobail.oItowasoheldothatotheo natureoandotheogravityoofotheoaccusationoandotheoexactoroleoofotheoaccusedo mustobeoproperlyocomprehendedobeforeoarrestoisomadeoandothatotheocourto mustoevaluateotheoavailableomaterialoagainstotheoaccusedoveryocarefully.oIto wasoalsooheldothatotheocourtoshouldoalsooconsiderowhetherotheoaccusationso haveo beeno madeo onlyo witho theo objecto ofo injuringo oro humiliatingo theo o o o o o o o o 6o o o 77.o Aftero referringo tooSiddharamo Satlingappao Mhetreo [Siddharamo SatlingappaoMhetreov.oStateoofoMaharashtra,o(2011)o1oSCCo694o:o(2011)o1o SCCo(Cri)o514]oandootherojudgmentsoandoobservingothatoanticipatoryobailo canobeograntedoonlyoinoexceptionalocircumstances,oinoJaioPrakashoSinghov.o StateoofoBiharo[JaioPrakashoSinghov.oStateoofoBihar,o(2012)o4oSCCo379o:o

(2012)o2oSCCo(Cri)o468]o,otheoSupremeoCourtoheldoasoundero:o(SCCop.o386,o(2012)o2oSCCo(Cri)o468] parao19)oo o "19.o Parameterso foro granto ofo anticipatoryo bailo ino ao seriouso offenceo areo requiredotoobeosatisfiedoandofurtherowhileograntingosuchorelief,otheocourto mustorecordotheoreasonsotherefor.oAnticipatoryobailocanobeograntedoonlyoino exceptionalocircumstancesowhereotheocourtoisoprimaofacieoofotheoviewothato theoapplicantohasofalselyobeenoenropedoinotheocrimeoandowouldonotomisuseo hiso liberty.o (SeeoD.K.o Ganesho Babuo v.o P.T.o Manokarano [D.K.o Ganesho Babuov.oP.T.oManokaran,o(2007)o4oSCCo434o:(2007)o2oSCCo(Cri)o345]o,o StateoofoMaharashtraov.oMohd.oSajidoHusainoMohd.oS.oHusaino[StateoofoStateoofoMaharashtraov.oMohd.oSajidoHusainoMohd.oS.oHusaino[Stateoofo Maharashtraov.oMohd.oSajidoHusainoMohd.oS.oHusain,o(2008)o1oSCCo213o:o

(2008)o1oSCCo(Cri)o176]oandoUnionoofoIndiaov.oPadamoNarainoAggarwalo [UnionoofoIndiaov.oPadamoNarainoAggarwal,o(2008)o13oSCCo305o:o(2009)o1o SCCo(Cri)o1]o.)"o o Economicooffenceso o 78.oPowerounderoSectiono438oCrPCobeingoanoextraordinaryoremedy,ohasotoo beoexercisedosparingly;omoreoso,oinocasesoofoeconomicooffences.oEconomico offencesostandoasoaodifferentoclassoasotheyoaffectotheoeconomicofabricoofotheo society.oInoDirectorateoofoEnforcementov.oAshokoKumaroJaino[Directorateo ofoEnforcementov.oAshokoKumaroJain,o(1998)o2oSCCo105o:o1998oSCCo(Cri)oofoEnforcement v.oAshokoKumaroJain,o(1998)o2 SCCo105o:o1998oSCCo(Cri)o 510],oitowasoheldothatoinoeconomicooffences,otheoaccusedoisonotoentitledotoo anticipatoryobail."o o 15.oInoSushilao Agrawalo ando otherso v.o Stateo (NCTo ofo Delhi)o ando Anotheroreportedoino(2020)o5oSCCo1,oConstitutionoBenchoofothisoCourtoheldo thatowhileoconsideringoanoapplicationoforograntoofopre-arrestobailotheoCourto haso too considero theo natureo ofo theo offence,o theo roleo ofo theo person,o theo likelihoodoofohisoinfluencingotheocourseoofoinvestigation,oorotamperingowitho evidenceoorolikelihoodoofofleeingojustice.oTheoCourtoheld:-o o "92.4.oCourtsooughtotoobeogenerallyoguidedobyoconsiderationsosucho asotheonatureoandogravityoofotheooffences,otheoroleoattributedotootheo applicant,oandotheofactsoofotheocase,owhileoconsideringowhetherotoo grantoanticipatoryobail,oororefuseoit.oWhetherotoograntooronotoisoao mattero ofo discretion;o equallyo whethero ando ifo so,o whato kindo ofo specialo conditionso areo too beo imposedo (oro noto imposed)o areo dependentoonofactsoofotheocase,oandosubjectotootheodiscretionoofotheo court."o o

9.o o AsoperotheocaseoputoforthoinotheoFIRoinoquestion,oindubitably,o seriouso allegationso haveo beeno levelledo againsto theopetitioners.o Aso pero theo versionoputoforthobyotheoprosecution,oonotheoallegedodayoofooccurrence,otheo petitionersoalongwithootheroco-accusedoformedoanounlawfuloassembly,osomeo ofothemoarmedowithoweaponsoandohavingocommonointention,obargedointootheo houseoofocomplainantoandoattackedouponohimoandohisofamilyomembers.oTotalo 05oinjuriesowereoinflictedouponocomplainant,oandooutoofothem,oinjuriesoNo.1o o o o o o o o o 7o o ando3owereofoundogrievousoinonature.oTotalo03oinjuriesowereoinflictedoupono theocomplainant'sofather,onamely,oHardeepoSingh,oandooutoofothem,oinjuryo No.1o waso declaredo grievouso ino nature.o Further,o totalo 04o injurieso wereo inflictedouponocomplainant'somother,onamely,oInderjitoKaur,oando03oinjurieso wereoinflictedouponowifeoofocomplainant,onamely,oSukhwinderoKaur.oTheo petitionero(JogaoSingh)oalongwithoco-accusedoSawinderoSingh,oarmedowitho weapons,oattackedouponotheocomplainant'sofatheroHardeepoSinghowithotheo intentiono too killo him.o Multipleo injurieso wereo causedo too Hardeepo Singh,o InderjitoKaur,oSukhwinderoKauroandotheocomplainant,owhoowereoattackedo upon.oTheopetitionero(SukhdevoSingh)oarmedowithosickle,oattackedouponotheo complainantowithoanointentionotookillohim.ooAllotheoaccusedopersons,oaftero formingo unlawfulo assemblyo ando enteringo intoo theo houseo ofo complainant,o committedoseriousoandograveooffenceoinoquestion.oRecoveryoofotheoweaponso isoyetotoobeoeffectedofromotheopetitioner(s).oo o o TheopetitionersohaveospecificallyobeenonamedoinotheoFIR,oando natureoofotheo injurieso attributedo too them,o areo seriouso ando life-threatening,o reflectingoseverityoofotheoallegedoact.oNoocauseonayoplausibleocauseohasobeeno shown,oatothisostage,ofromowhichoitocanobeodecipheredothatotheopetitionerso haveobeenofalselyoimplicatedointootheopresentoFIR.oItogoesowithoutosayingothato ino theo instanto case,o theo complainanto haso categoricallyo statedo thato theo petitionersoalongowithoco-accusedoandoasopartoofoanounlawfuloassembly,oactedo inofurtheranceoofotheirocommonoobjectotooinflictomultipleoinjuriesouponotheo complainantoparty.oo

10.o o Itoisobefittingotoomentionohereothatowhileoconsideringoaopleaoforo grantoofoanticipatoryobail,otheoCourtohasotooequilibrateobetweenosafeguardingo o o o o o o o o 8o o individualo rightso ando protectingo societalo interest(s).o Theo Courto oughto too reckonowithotheomagnitudeoandonatureoofotheooffence;otheoroleoattributedotoo theoaccused;otheoneedoforofairoandofreeoinvestigationoasoalsootheodeeperoando wideoimpactoofosuchoallegedoiniquitiesoonotheosociety.oItoisoimperativeothato everyopersonoinotheoSocietyocanoexpectoanoatmosphereofreeofromoforebodingo &ofearoofoanyotransgression.ooAtothisostage,othereoisonoomaterialoonorecordotoo holdo thato primao facieo caseo iso noto madeo outo againsto theo petitioners.o Theo materialowhichohasocomeoonorecordoandopreliminaryoinvestigation,oappearotoo beo establishedo ao reasonableo basiso foro theo accusations.o Thus,o ito iso noto appropriateotoograntoanticipatoryobailotootheopetitioner,oasoitowouldonecessarilyo causeoimpedimentoinoeffectiveoinvestigation.ooInoStateov.oAniloSharma,o(1997)o 7oSCCo187,otheoSupremeoCourtoheldoasoundero:o(SCCop.o189,oparao6)oo o "6.oWeofindoforceoinotheosubmissionoofoCBIothatocustodialointerrogationoiso qualitativelyomoreoelicitation-orientedothanoquestioningoaosuspectowhooisowell-ensconcedowithoaofavourableoorderounderoSectiono438oofotheoCode.oInoaocaseo likeo this,o effectiveo interrogationo ofo ao suspectedo persono iso ofo tremendouso advantageoinodisinterringomanyousefuloinformationsoandoalsoomaterialsowhicho wouldohaveobeenoconcealed.oSuccessoinosuchointerrogationowouldoeludeoifotheo suspectedopersonoknowsothatoheoisowelloprotectedoandoinsulatedobyoaopre-arresto bailoorderoduringotheotimeoheoisointerrogated.oVeryooftenointerrogationoinosucho aoconditionowouldoreduceotooaomereoritual.oTheoargumentothatotheocustodialo interrogationoisofraughtowithotheodangeroofotheopersonobeingosubjectedotoothird-degreeo methodso needo noto beo countenanced,o for,o sucho ano argumento cano beo advancedobyoalloaccusedoinoallocriminalocases.oTheoCourtohasotoopresumeothato responsibleopoliceoofficersowouldoconductothemselvesoinoaoresponsibleomannero ando thato thoseo entrustedo witho theo tasko ofo disinterringo offenceso wouldo noto conductothemselvesoasooffenders."o o

10.1.o o Ino viewo ofo theo seriousnesso ofo theo allegations,o theo dangerouso natureoofo theo injuries,o formingo unlawfulo assemblyo whileo havingo commono intention,oandotheoovertlyoviolentoconductoofotheoaccusedoasoreflectedoinotheo availableo evidence,o thiso Courto findso noo compellingo groundo too extendo theo benefitoofodiscretionaryoreliefotootheopetitioners.oGrantingobailoatothisostageo wouldo noto onlyo undermineo theo administrationo ofo justiceo buto mayo alsoo o o o o o o o o 9o o emboldenotheoaccusedoandoposeoaothreatotootheosafetyoandowell-beingoofotheo victimoandootherowitnesses.ooInoviewoofotheogravityoofotheoallegations,otheo specifico roleo attributedo too theo petitioners,o theo seriouso natureo ofo injurieso sustainedobyotheovictimsoandotheonecessityoofocustodialointerrogationoforoaofairo andothoroughoinvestigation,othisoCourtoisoofotheoconsideredoopinionothatotheo petitionersodoonotodeserveotheoconcessionoofoanticipatoryobailoinotheofactualo matrixo ofo theo caseo ino hand.o Moreover,o custodialo interrogationo ofo theo petitionersoisonecessaryoforoanoeffectiveoinvestigationo&otoounravelotheotruth.o Theopetitionsoare,othus,odevoidoofomeritsoandoareoherebyodismissed.oo

11.o o Nothingosaidohereinaboveoshallobeodeemedotoobeoanoexpressiono ofoopinionouponomeritsoofotheocase/investigation.oo

12.o o Pendingoapplication(s),oifoany,oshalloalsoostandodisposedoof.oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooo(SUMEEToGOEL)o o o o o o o o o ooooJUDGEo Septembero01,o2025o mahaviroo Whetherospeaking/reasoned:o o Yes/Noo o Whetheroreportable:o o o Yes/Noo

Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.