Sachin Kumar v. State of Haryana

o

1o o o 150o INoTHEoHIGHoCOURToOFoPUNJABoANDoHARYANAoAToCHANDIGARHoINoTHEoHIGHoCOURToOFoPUNJABoANDoHARYANA AToCHANDIGARH o o SachinoKumaroo ….Petitionero versuso StateoofoHaryanaoo ….Respondento o DateoofoDecision:oAprilo16,o2026o DateoofoUploading:oAprilo17,o2026o o CORAM:o HON'BLEoMR.oJUSTICEoSUMEEToGOELo o Present:-o Mr.oAtuloYadav,oAdvocateoforotheopetitioner.ooo o o o Ms.oPriyankaoSadaroThakur,oSenioroDAGoHaryana.oo o *****o SUMEEToGOEL,oJ.o(ORAL)oo o o o PresentopetitionoisotheosecondoattemptounderoSectiono482oofotheo BharatiyaoNagarikoSurakshaoSanhita,o2023o(foroshorto'BNSS')o(earlieroSectiono 438oCr.oP.C.)oforograntoofoanticipatoryobailotootheopetitioner,oinocaseobearingoFIRo No.1488o datedo 22.12.2022,o registeredo foro theo offenceso punishableo undero Sectionso 420/o 467/o 468/o 471o ofo theo IPC,o 1860o (nowo Sectionso 318(4),o 338,o 336(3)oando340(2)oofotheoBNS,o2023),oatoPoliceoStationoSadaroHisar.oo

2.oo o Theogravamenoofotheoallegationsoagainstotheopetitioneroisothatotheo Commandant,o HAP-DURGA-Isto Battalion,o Hisaro wroteo too SP,o Hisaro foro registrationoofocriminalocaseoagainstocandidateoDivyaoKumarioNo.3354/OIodatedo

06.12.2022.oItowasoallegedothato698ofemaleocandidatesohadobeenoallottedotootheo battalionoforoappointmentotootheopostoofoConstable.oAsoperotheoreportsofromotheo Universities,oitowasofoundothatocandidateo–oDivyaoKumari,obearingoRolloNo.o

o o o

2o o 4203110724,o Category-BC-B,o hado usedo bogus/fakeo educationalo documentso (DegreeoofoGraduationofromoManavoBhartioUniversity,oHimachaloPradeshoando Degreeo ofo Posto Graduationo fromo Stateo ofo Karnatakao Openo University,o MukthagangotrioMysure)oforoavailingotheojoboofoConstable.oUponoreceiptoofo Originalo educationalo certificateso ando theiro verificationo reporto fromo theo Universities,otheosaidodocumentsowereofoundobogus.oAccordingly,oaoformaloFIRo wasogotoregistered.oo o o Duringoinvestigation,oDivyaoKumariorevealedothatotheosaidoBAoando MAodegreesohadobeenodeliveredotooherobyoSachinoKumaro(petitioneroherein)oando hadomadeoherotooappearoforoB.A.oExamination.oo

3.o o Learnedocounseloforotheopetitionerohasoarguedothatotheopetitionero haso beeno falselyo implicatedo intoo theo FIRo ino question.o Learnedo counselo haso arguedothatotheopetitionerowasonotonamedoinotheoFIRoinoquestion,oandoheohaso beenoimplicatedoinotheopresentocaseoafteroaodelayoofomoreothano2½oyearsoandothato toooonlyoonotheobasisoofodisclosureostatementoofoco-accused,onamely,oDivyao Kumari,o ando sucho disclosureo iso noto tenableo ino law.o Learnedo counselo haso submittedo thato ito iso highlyo unbelievableo thato ino respecto fake/o boguso degreeso havingo beeno deliveredo too theo co-accused,o ino theo yearo 2016-17,o ano allegedo transactionowasomade,oinotheoyearo2021o(afteroaodelayoofoabouto04oyears)obyotheo husbandoofotheoco-accusedointootheoaccountoofotheopetitioner.oLearnedocounselo hasofurtherosubmittedothat,oinofact,oinotheoyearo2024,obrotheroofotheopetitionerohado diedounfortunately,owhoousedotoorunoaoCoachingoCentreoandosaidoco-accusedohado dealingsowithotheobrotheroofotheopetitioner,obutoafterotheodeathoofobrotheroofotheo petitioner,o co-accusedo choseo too falselyo implicateo theo petitioner,o witho someo ulterioromotive.oLearnedocounselohasosubmittedothatotheoentireocaseoisobasedoono

o o o

3o o documentaryo evidenceo ando theo sameo iso alreadyo ino theo custodyo ofo theo investigatingoagency.oo

3.1.o o Learnedo counselo foro theo petitionero haso arguedo thato co-accused,o namely,oDivyaoKumarohasobeenograntedoconcessionoofoanticipatoryobailobyothiso Court,ovideoorderodatedo16.05.2024opassedoinoCRM-M-12569-2024.oo

3.2.o o Learnedo counselo haso submittedo thato earliero theo petitionero hado approachedothisoCourtoforograntoofoanticipatoryobailobyowayoofoCRM-M-66199-2025,oandotheosameocameotoobeodismissedoonomeritsothereof,ovideoorderodatedo

26.11.2025.oo

3.3.o o Learnedocounselohasoarguedothatonothingoisotoobeorecoveredofromo theopetitioner.oLearnedocounselohasofurtheroiteratedothatotheopetitioneroisoreadyo andowillingotoojoinoinvestigation,oandonoopurposeowouldobeoservedobyokeepingo theopetitionerobehindobars.oOnotheobasisoofotheoaforementionedosubmissions,o grantoofotheoinstantopetitionoisoprayedofor.oo

4.o o Onotheootherohand,olearnedoStateocounselohasoopposedotheograntoofo anticipatoryobailotootheopetitionerobyoarguingothatoallegationsoraisedoagainstotheo petitionero areo seriouso ino nature.o Learnedo Stateo counselo haso statedo thato theo petitionero hado indulgedo ino non-ethicalo activitieso byo illegallyo providingo fake/o bogusodegreesotooco-accused,onamely,oDivyaoKumari.oItohasobeenoassertedothato disclosureo statemento ofo theo co-accusedo iso dulyo corroboratedo byo electronico evidenceoseizedoduringoinvestigation.oAccordingotoolearnedoStateocounsel,otheo petitioneroisostatedotoobeotheopersonowhooarrangedotheobogus/ofakeodegreesoando facilitatedotheoexaminationoandoformingopartoofoaolargerofraudulentomechanismo ino securingo publico employment.o Learnedo Stateo counselo haso emphasizedo thato custodialointerrogationoofotheopetitioneroisoessentialotoounearthoentireochainoofo

o o o

4o o personso involvedo ando theo sourceo ofo theo forgedo documents.o Ito iso therefore,o submittedo thato theo presento petitiono iso devoido ofo merito ando iso liableo too beo dismissed.oo

5.o o Iohaveoheardotheolearnedocounseloforotheorivalopartiesoandohaveo goneothroughotheoavailableorecordoofotheocase.oo

6.o o Itowouldobeoappositeotooreferohereinotooaojudgmentopassedobyothiso Courto ino ao titledo aso Bhishamo Singho vs.o Stateo ofo Haryana,o 2024(3)o RCR(Criminal)o65,orelevantowhereoforeadsoasounder:oo "11.o Asoanoepilogueotootheoaboveorumination,otheofollowingoprincipleso emerge:oo Io Second/successiveoanticipatoryobailopetition(s)ofiledoundero Sectiono438oofoCr.P.C.,o1973oisomaintainableoinolawo&ohenceosucho petitiono oughto noto too beo rejectedo solelyo ono theo groundo ofo maintainabilityothereof.o IIo oSucho second/successiveo anticipatoryo bailo petition(s)o iso maintainableo whethero earliero petitiono waso dismissedo aso withdrawn/dismissedoasonotopressed/dismissedoforonon-prosecutiono oroearlieropetitionowasodismissedoonomerits.o IIIo oForotheosecond/successiveoanticipatoryobailopetition(s)otoo succeed,o theo petitioner/applicanto shallo beo essentially/pertinentlyo requiredotooshowosubstantialochangeoinocircumstancesoandoshowingo ofoaomereosuperficialooroostensibleochangeowouldonotosuffice.o IVo oNooexhaustiveoguidelinesocanopossiblyobeolaidodownoasotoo whatowouldoconstituteosubstantialochangeoinocircumstancesoasoeveryo caseohasoitsoownouniqueofacts/circumstance.oAccordingly,othisoissueo iso besto lefto too theo judicialo wisdomo ando discretiono ofo theo Courto dealingowithosuchosecond/successiveoanticipatoryobailopetition(s).o Vo oIno caseo ao Courto chooseso too granto second/successiveo anticipatoryo bailo petition(s),o cogento ando lucido reasonso areo pertinentlyorequiredotoobeorecordedoforograntingosuchopleaodespiteo suchoaopleaobeingosecond/successiveopetition(s).oInootherowords,otheo causeo foro ao Courto havingo successfullyo countenanced/entertainedo suchosecond/successiveopetition(s)ooughtotoobeoreadilyoandoclearlyo decipherableofromotheosaidoorderopassed.oo VIo Onceo ao pleao foro anticipatoryo bailo haso beeno dismissedo aso withdrawn/dismissedoasonotopressed/dismissedoforonon-prosecutiono orodismissedoonomeritsobyotheoHighoCourt,onoosecond/successiveo anticipatoryo bailo petition(s)o shallo beo entertainedo byo ao Sessionso Court."o o

7.o o Apartofromoitobeingosecondoanticipatoryobail,oasoperotheocaseoputo forthoinotheoFIRoinoquestion,oindubitably,oseriousoallegationsohaveobeenoleveledo

o o o

5o o againstotheopetitioner.oAsoperoprosecutionocase,omaterialowhichohasocomeoono recordo indicateso thato theo allegationso againsto theo petitionero pertaino too procurementoandosupplyoofoforgedodegreesotooco-accused,othereby,ofacilitatingo co-accusedotoosecureorecruitmentointootheopoliceoforce.oTheomereofactothatotheo petitionerowasonotonamedoinotheoFIRoisoofonoohelpoasotheoFIRoisonotoexpectedotoo beoanoencyclopediaoofofactsoandotheoroleoofotheopetitionerosurfacedoduringotheo courseo ofo investigationo ono theo basiso ofo materialo subsequentlyo collected.o Furthermore,otheodisclosureostatementoofotheoco-accusedohasoledotoorecoveryoofo theo electronico material,o whicho primao facieo corroborateso involvemento ofo theo petitioneroand,otherefore,otheosameocannotobeobrushedoaside,oatothisostage.oAsopero prosecutionocase,ocustodialointerrogationoofotheopetitioneroisoessentialotootraceo sourceoofoforgedodocumentsoandounravelolargeroconspiracyo(ifoany).oTheodelayoino implicatingotheopetitionerodoesonotoweakenotheoprosecutionocaseoasoroleoofotheo petitionerosurfacedoonlyoduringoinvestigation.oo

7.1.o o Theopleaoofoparityowithoco-accused,onamely,oDivyaoKumarioisoalsoo misplacedo aso hero roleo aso ao beneficiaryo iso distincto fromo theo allegedo activeo involvemento ofo theo petitionero ino procuringo theo forgedo documents.o Theo roleo attributedotootheopetitioneroisodemonstrablyomoreoactive,ograveoandoculpableoino comparisonotoothatoofotheoco-accusedowhoohasoalreadyobeenoenlargedoonobail.o Theopetitioneroisoallegedotoohaveoplayedoaocentraloandooverarchingoroleoinotheo commissionoofotheooffenceoindicatingoaohigherodegreeoofoinvolvementoandomenso rea.oAccordingly,otheopetitionerocannotoclaimoparityowithotheoco-accusedoasotheo principleoofoparityodoesonotoapplyowhereotheodegreeoofoparticipationoandotheo gravityo ofo allegationso materiallyo differ.o Theo seriousnesso ando gravityo ofo theo allegationsoweighoheavilyoagainstotheograntoofoanticipatoryobailotootheopetitioner.o

o o o

6o o Theo allegationso againsto theo presento petitionero relateo too theo procurement,o facilitationo ando useo ofo theo forgedo educationalo degreeso foro securingo publico employmento ino theo policeo force.o Sucho ano acto strikeso ato theo rooto ofo theo institutionalointegrityoandopublicotrustoand,otherefore,owarrantsoaostrongojudicialo approach.oo

7.2.o o Itoisotriteolawothatoanticipatoryobailoisoanoextraordinaryoremedyonoto too beo grantedo aso ao mattero ofo courseo particularlyo ino caseso involvingo forgedo educationalodegreesoforosecuringopublicoemploymentoinotheopoliceoforce.oWhileo consideringoanticipatoryobail,otheoCourtomustostrikeoaobalanceobetweenotheorighto ofo theo individualo too libertyo ando theo needo foro free,o fairo ando effectiveo investigation.oInotheoconsideredoopinionoofothisoCourt,ograntingoanticipatoryobailo tootheopetitioneroatothisostageomayolikelyotoohamperotheoon-goingoinvestigation.oo

7.3.o o Noocauseonayoplausibleocauseohasobeenoshown,oatothisostage,ofromo whichoitocanobeodecipheredothatotheopetitionerohasobeenofalselyoimplicatedointoo theopresentoFIR.oo

7.4.o o Furthermore,o theo investigationo iso stillo ato ao crucialo stage,o ando custodialointerrogationoofotheopetitioneroisoconsideredonecessaryotoounearthotheo completeofactsoandotooascertainoinvolvementoofoanyootheropersonsoconnectedo withotheocase.oTheopetitioneroisoyetotoobeoarrestedoandograntoofoanticipatoryobail,o ato thiso stage,o mayo prejudiceo theo ongoingo investigation.o Theo apprehensiono expressedo byo theo prosecutiono thato theo petitioner,o ifo releasedo ono bail,o mayo abscondooroattemptotooinfluenceowitnessesoalsooappearsotoobeonotowithoutobasis.o Givenotheoseriousnessoofotheooffence,otheostageoofoinvestigationoandopossibilityo ofotamperingowithoevidenceooroobstructingojustice,othisoCourtoisoofotheoviewothato theopetitionerodoesonotodeserveotheoconcessionoofobailoatothisojuncture.oo

o o o

7o o

8.o o Itoisobefittingotoomentionohereothatowhileoconsideringopleaoforogranto ofo anticipatoryo bail,o theo Courto haso too equilibrateo betweeno safeguardingo individualorightsoandoprotectingosocietalointerest(s).oTheoCourtooughtotooreckono withotheomagnitudeoandonatureoofotheooffence;otheoroleoattributedotootheoaccused;o theoneedoforofairoandofreeoinvestigationoasoalsootheodeeperoandowideoimpactoofo suchoallegedoiniquitiesoonotheosociety.oAoprofitableoreferenceoinothisoregardoiso beingomadeotootheodictaopassedobyotheoHon'bleoSupremeoCourtotitledoasoStateov.o AniloSharma,o(1997)o7oSCCo187o:o1997oSCCo(Cri)o1039,otheoSupremeoCourto heldoasounder,orelevantowhereoforeadsoasounder:oo "6.oo WeofindoforceoinotheosubmissionoofoCBIothatocustodialointerrogationo isoqualitativelyomoreoelicitation-orientedothanoquestioningoaosuspectowhooiso well-ensconcedowithoaofavourableoorderounderoSectiono438oofotheoCode.oInoao caseolikeothis,oeffectiveointerrogationoofoaosuspectedopersonoisoofotremendouso advantageoinodisinterringomanyousefuloinformationsoandoalsoomaterialsowhicho wouldohaveobeenoconcealed.oSuccessoinosuchointerrogationowouldoeludeoifotheo suspectedopersonoknowsothatoheoisowelloprotectedoandoinsulatedobyoaopre-arresto bailoorderoduringotheotimeoheoisointerrogated.oVeryooftenointerrogationoinosucho aoconditionowouldoreduceotooaomereoritual.oTheoargumentothatotheocustodialo interrogationoisofraughtowithotheodangeroofotheopersonobeingosubjectedotoothird-degreeo methodso needo noto beo countenanced,o for,o sucho ano argumento cano beo advancedobyoalloaccusedoinoallocriminalocases.oTheoCourtohasotoopresumeothato responsibleopoliceoofficersowouldoconductothemselvesoinoaoresponsibleomannero ando thato thoseo entrustedo witho theo tasko ofo disinterringo offenceso wouldo noto conductothemselvesoasooffenders."o o o Atothisostage,othereoisonoomaterialoonorecordotooholdothatoprimao facieocaseoisonotomadeooutoagainstotheopetitioner.oTheomaterialowhichohasocomeo onorecordoandopreliminaryoinvestigation,oappearotooestablishoaoreasonableobasiso foroaccusationoofotheopetitioner.oThus,oitoisonotoappropriateotoograntoanticipatoryo bailotootheopetitioner,oasoitowouldonecessarilyocauseoimpedimentoinoeffectiveo investigation.oo

9.o o Thatoapart,oindubitably,otheofirstopetitiono(forograntoofoanticipatoryo bail)opreferredobyotheopetitionerowasodismissedoonomeritsotheroefobyothisoCourto ono26.11.2025.oItoisowellosettledothatoaosecondoanticipatoryobailopetitionoseekingo

o o o

8o o identicalo reliefo iso noto maintainableo unlesso thereo iso ao substantialo changeo ino circumstancesoafterotheodisposaloorowithdrawaloasoperotheojurisprudenceoonobail.o Theogroundsourgedoinotheopresentopetitionoappearotoobeotheosameoasothoseowhicho wereo availableo too theo petitionero ato theo timeo wheno theo earliero petitiono waso withdrawn.o Ino theo absenceo ofo anyo newo fact,o developmento oro changeo ino circumstances,o entertainingo successiveopetitionsowouldo amounto too permittingo repeatedoattemptsoforotheosameorelief,owhichocannotobeocountenancedoinolaw.o Therefore,onotwithstandingotheosubmissionoregardingotheoroleoattributedotootheo petitioner,othisoCourtofindsothatotheopresentopetitionosuffersofromotheoviceoofo maintainability,oasonoochangeoinocircumstancesohasobeenodemonstratedoafterotheo withdrawaloofotheoearlieroanticipatoryobailopetition.oAccordingly,othisoCourtoiso noto inclinedo too granto theo concessiono ofo anticipatoryo bailo too theo petitioner.o Furthermore,othereoisonoochangeonayosubstantialochangeoinocircumstancesowhicho mayoweigh,oinofavouroofoentertainingotheoinstantosecondopetitionoforoanticipatoryo bail.oErgo,otheoinstantopetitionodeservesodismissaloonothisoscoreoalone.oo

10.o o Itoisoevidentothatotheolastopleaoforograntoofoanticipatoryobailotootheo petitionerowasodismissedoonomeritsothereofoono26.11.2025,oandotheopetitionoino handohasobeenofiledoonooroaroundo10.04.2026.oTheoconductoofotheopetitioneroino avoidingoarrestoforosuchoaoprolongedoperiodowithoutoanyoreasonableocauseomusto beoconsideredowhileoadjudicatingothisosecondopetition.oTheoprocessoofojusticeoiso meanto too treato everyo individualo ino ao mannero whicho iso equitableo ando fairly.oo However;oifotheopetitioner-accusedochoosesotooemployoirregularoandoconvolutedo tactics,o includingo undueo delay,o strategicallyo aimedo ato frustratingo lawfulo proceedings/investigation,oitotantamountotooanoabuseoofotheoprocessoofojustice.o Whileolibertyoandodignityoofoanoindividualomustobeoheldohigh,ohowever,onoooneo

o o o

9o o cano beopermittedo too subverto ando causeo devolutiono ino theoprocesso ofo justice.o Protractedoabsence,oeludingotheoprocessoofolawoandoabruptorepetitionoofopleasoforo pre-arresto bail,o ino absenceo ofo convincingo reason(s)o iso certainlyo noto ano act/behaviourowhichocallsoforosympathy/indulgenceoofotheoCourt.ooTherefore,otheo conductoofotheopetitionerowhenoexaminedoinotheobackdropoofotheonature/severityo ofoallegationsomadeoagainstotheopetitioner,odisentitlesotheopetitioneroforograntoofo anticipatoryobail.oFromotheoentireofactualoconspectusobroughtoforwardoinotheo presentopetition,onoofreshogroundoorocircumstanceoisomadeooutosooasotooenableo theopetitionerotoofileoandomaintainotheosecondoanticipatoryobailopetition.oo

11.o o Thereo iso anothero aspecto nayo vitalo aspecto ofo theo mattero whicho deservesotoobeoaddressedobyothisoCourt.oo o o Theo sanctityo ofo theo judicialo processo iso predicatedo upono theo principleo ofo finalityo ofo judicialo orders.o Whileo thereo iso noo expresso statutoryo embargooagainstotheofilingoofosuccessiveoapplicationsoforoanticipatoryobail,osucho aorightoisonotoanoabsoluteocharteroforoproceduraloadventurism.oAolitigantowhoo approachesotheosameoCourtoforotheosameorelief,oabsentoanyomaterialochangeoino circumstancesoengagesoinoaostratagemoofoattritionothatoisolessoaopursuitoofojusticeo andomoreoanoexerciseoofotestingotheowaters.oSuchoaopracticeoconstitutesoaoclassico caseoofoforumoshopping,owhereinotheolitigantotreatsotheohallsoofojusticeoasoao laboratoryoforospeculativeolitigation.oByorepeatedlyoknockingoonotheosameodooro withouto ao fresho causeo ofo action,o sucho ao litiganto attempto too circumvento theo hierarchyoofotheocourtsoignoringotheowell-settledoprincipleothatoaopartyoaggrievedo byoanoorderomustoascendotheojudicialoladderoratherothanomoveohorizontallyoino hopesoofoaomoreofavourableowind.oo

o o o

10o o

11.1o o Pertinently,othisohitoandotryomethodologyoisoaomaladyothatomustobeo detestedobyothisoCourt,oasoitostrikesoatotheoveryorootoofojudicialopropriety.oToo permitoaolitigantotootreatotheodismissaloofoaoprioropetitionoasoaomereointerlocutoryo suggestion,o rathero thano ano authoritativeo pronouncement,o iso too inviteo judicialo anarchy.oWhenoaoCourtoisoinvitedotoore-evaluateotheosameofactsoandotheosameo lawopreviouslyoadjudicatedoupon,oitocreatesoaoperilousoriskoofoconflictingoorders,o therebyoerodingotheopublicofaithoinotheoconsistencyoandomajestyoofotheolaw.oTheo judicialotimeoisoaopreciousopublicoresource,oandoitsodiversionointootheoredundanto channelso ofo repetitiveo pleaso iso ao vexatiouso abuseo ofo process.o Thereo iso noo gainsayingo thato ifo thereo iso materialo changeo ino circumstanceso theo second/subsequentopleaooughtotoobeoconsideredoonomeritsothereof,ohowever,oifo sucho ao second/subsequento pleao iso basedo ono similaro factualo milieu,o theo sameo oughtotoobeonippedoinotheobudowithoanoironohand.oPertinently,osuchovexatiousoando virulentoattempt(s)obyounscrupulousoelements,oaimedoatomisusingotheoprocessoofo lawoandoCourts,ooughtotoobeodetested.oTheosanctityoofotheojudicialoprocessowillo beoseriouslyoerodedoifosuchoattempt(s)oisonotorespondedowithofirmness.oAolitiganto whoomisusesotheoprocessoofolawoorotakeolibertiesowithotheoproceduraloconcessiono shouldobeoleftoinonoodoubtoaboutotheoconsequencesotoofollow.oOthersoshouldobeo discouragedonototooventureoalongotheosameopathoinotheohopeooroonoaomisplacedo expectationo ofo judicialo leniencyo oro indulgence.o Exemplaryo costs,o ino sucho ao situationoareoinevitableoandonecessary,osooasotooensureothatoinolitigation,oasoinotheo lawowhichoisoratheropracticedoinoouroCountry,othereoisonoopremiumoonosuchoao misplacedo adventurism.o Accordingly,o costs,o whicho oughto too beoveritableoando realotimeoinonature,otoobeoimposedouponotheopetitioner.oo

12.o o Inoviewoofotheoprevenientoratiocination,oitoisoordainedothus:o

o o o

11o o

(i)o Theopetitionoinohandoisodevoidoofomeritsoandoisoherebyodismissedo withocostsoofo₹10,000/-,owhichoshallobeodepositedobyotheopetitionero withoChiefoJudicialoMagistrateo(CJM),oHisarowithinofouroweekso fromotoday.oInocaseosuchocostsoareodeposited;oCJM,oHisaroshallo haveotheosameoremittedotootheoDistrictoLegaloServicesoAuthority,o Hisar.ooInocase,otheosaidocostsoareonotodepositedobyotheopetitioneroaso directedofor;otheoCJM,oHisaroisodirectedotoointimateotheoDeputyo Commissioner,oHisarowhooshallohaveosuchocostsorecoveredofromo theo petitionero aso arrearso ofo lando revenueo ando upono realizationo thereof,o theo Deputyo Commissioner,o Hisaro shallo haveo theo sameo submittedo too CJM,oHisar,o foro furthero remittanceo thereofo tooTheo DistrictoLegaloServicesoAuthority,oHisar.oAocomplianceoreportobeo sentobyoCJM,oHisaroasoalsooDeputyoCommissioner,oHisarotoothiso Court,oaccordingly;oo o

(ii)o RegistryoisodirectedotootransmitoaocopyoofothisojudgmentotooCJM,o Hisaro aso alsoo Deputyo Commissioner,o Hisaro foro requisiteo compliance;o o

(iii)o Anyo observationso madeo and/oro submissionso notedo hereinaboveo shallo noto haveo anyo effecto ono meritso ofo theo caseo ando theo investigatingoagencyoasoalsootheotrialoCourtoshalloproceedofurther,o inoaccordanceowitholaw,owithoutobeingoinfluencedowithothisoorder.oo o

(iv)o Pendingoapplication(s),oifoany,oshalloalsoostandodisposedooff.o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo(SUMEEToGOEL)o o o o o o JUDGEo Aprilo16,o2026oo mahaviro o Whetherospeaking/reasoned:o o Yes/Noo o Whetheroreportable:o o o Yes/Noo

o o