Parvathy Ammal v. Nagammal

JUDGMENT It is submitted that Joint Compromise Memo has been entered into between parties and that Joint Compromise Memo is filed into this Court.

¶2Due to old age, the appellant is represented by her son Rajakumar. The second respondent is present.

¶3Recording the terms of Compromise Memo, the Second Appeal stands disposed of. The terms of Compromise Memo shall form part of the decree. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

12.12.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Padmanabapuram

2.TheDistrict Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel.

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.KALAIMATHI

, J.

mbi

12.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI S.A.No.908 of 2004 & C.M.P.No.6684 of 2004 Parvathy Ammal ...Appellant vs. Nagammal 2.M.Jochim ... Respondents (Respondent No.2 is impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 30.11.2023 in C.M.P.(MD)No.14961 of 2023 in S.A.No.908 of 2004) Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 21.10.2003 in A.S.No.76 of 1998 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Padmanabapuram confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 25.11.1997 in O.S.No.892 of 1995 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel. For Appellant : Mrs.J.Anandhavalli For Respondents : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh for Mr.T.Jeen Joseph for R2