- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 7 September 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA 855/2004
Judgment
JUDGMENT When the matter was taken up for hearing on 31.03.2008, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the sole appellant passed away. However, no steps have been taken till date and there is no representation on behalf of the respective parties. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
07.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes skn To:
1.The II Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Trichy.
2.The I Additional Subordinate Judge, Trichy.
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. skn
07.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 07.09.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY N.J.Santhanakrishnan ... Appellant -vs- G.Pachamuthu ... Respondent PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.06.2001 made in A.S.No.260 of 2000 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Trichy, partly reversing and modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 29.08.2000 made in O.S.No.235 of 1987 on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Judge, Trichy. For Appellant ... No appearance For Respondent ... No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.