C.K.Radhakrishnan, v. Dhakshinamara Nadar Sangam,

JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the appellant reported 'no instructions'.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that the suit was filed by the respondent / plaintiff for recovery of possession and the appellant / defendant himself has handed over the possession to the respondent / plaintiff. Therefore, he would submit that since the issue has been amicably settled between the parties, nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter.

¶3Recording the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the respondent and taking note of the statement of the learned counsel for the appellant that he has not received any instructions from the appellant, this Second Appeal is dismissed as no further orders are required. No costs.

10.08.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Ambasamudram

2.The Additional District Munsif, Ambasamudram.

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

, J.

mbi

10.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY C.K.Radhakrishnan ...Appellant vs. Dhakshinamara Nadar Sangam, Tirunelveli Junction, Rep. by its Secretary / Commissioner, M.S.Arunachala Nadar, No.70, Salai Street, Sindhu Poondhurai, Tirunelveli - 627 001. ... Respondent Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 09.01.2004 in A.S.No. 36 of 2002 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ambasamudram reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 15.09.2000 in O.S.No.377 of 1995 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Ambasamudram. For Appellant : Mr.P.Raja For Respondent : Mr.M.P.Senthil