- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 November 2023
- Bench
- S Justice R. Kalaimathi
- Case no.
- SA 757/2004
Judgment
JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants filed a Memo dated
14.10.2023 stating that she has no instructions from the appellants and hence, the names of the appellants have been printed in the cause list today. The Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
30.11.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To
1.The Sub Court, Periyakulam
2.The District Munsif Court, Periyakulam
3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.KALAIMATHI
, J.
mbi
30.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI 1.Kanniahsamy Naidu 2.Deivaranjitham 3.Mohan 4.Hema ...Appellants vs. 1.G.Jayaraj 2.Natarajan 3.S.Rengasamy 4.Govindaraj 5.Prasanna Lakshmi 6.Ramya Rani (Minor) ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.09.2003 in A.S.No.50 of 2001 on the file of the Sub Court, Periyakulam confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 09.01.2001 in O.S.No.638 of 1989 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Periyakulam. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.Suriyanarayanan for R3 No appearance for R1,R2, R4 to R6
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.