Arumugham,S/O Santhana Nadar, v. State of Tamil Nadu by Its Rep

JUDGMENT When the matter was taken up for hearing on 01.08.2023, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the sole appellant has passed away long before and he came to know about his death only recently.

¶2Today, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though he has sent letter to the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant, they have neither provided details nor responded to the letter.

¶3The sole appellant has passed away long before. However, till date, the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant have not taken any steps to implead themselves as appellants in the appeal. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.

17.08.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The Principal District Judge, Pudukkottai

2.The District Munsif, Keeranur

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

, J.

mbi

17.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Arumugham ...Appellant vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, by its Representative Collector, Pudukkottai. 2.The Tahsildar, Kulathur Taluk, Taluk Office, Keeranur. 3.Namasivayam Pillai ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 21.01.2003 in A.S.No. 34 of 2002 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Pudukkottai modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 20.09.2000 in O.S.No.121 of 1995 on the file of the District Munsif, Keeranur. For Appellant : Mr.K.Govindarajan For Respondents : Mr.A.Baskaran, Additional Government Pleader for R1 and R2 No appearance for R3