V.Krishnan v. Shahul Hameed

J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the sole appellant passed away and the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant not contacted him and hence, he reported that no instruction from the LRs. Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.

19.09.2023 akv To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam.

2.The District Munsif of Valangaimal, Kumbakonam.

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

,J.

akv

19.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY V.Krishnan ... Appellant Vs. Shahul Hammed ... Respondent PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 11.12.1997 made in A.S.No.12 of 1997 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam, reversing the judgment and decree dated 07.10.1996 made in O.S.No.303 of 1993 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif of Valangaimal at Kumbakonam. For Appellant : Mr.T.Susindran For Respondents : Mr.G.Gomathishankar