- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 7 September 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA 38/2004
Judgment
JUDGMENT It is seen that notice sent to the sole respondent returned on
30.05.2007 with an endorsement as 'expired'. However, no steps have been taken till date. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
07.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes skn To:
1.The Principal Sub Court, Madurai.
2.The District Munsif Court, Melur.
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. skn
07.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 07.09.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY A.Maharaja ... Appellant -vs- P.Alagu Ambalam ... Respondent PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 21.11.2002 made in A.S.No.23 of 2002 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Madurai confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 30.10.2001 made in O.S.No. 205 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Melur. For Appellant ... No appearance For Respondents ... No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.