Anjammal v. Rasappan

JUDGMENT As there was no representation for the appellant on the previous hearing, the matter is posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'.

¶2Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. The respondent is represented through counsel. Hence, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

07.12.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Pattukottai

2.The District Munsif, Pattukottai

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.KALAIMATHI

, J.

mbi

07.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI Anjammal ...Appellant vs. Rasappan ... Respondent Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 16.03.2004 in A.S.No.29 of 2003 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Pattukottai confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 12.06.2003 in O.S.No.244 of 1998 on the file of the District Munsif, Pattukottai. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.V.K.Vijayaraghavan