- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 September 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA 1290/2004
Judgment
JUDGMENT Mr.N.Vanchinathan, learned counsel for the appellants passed away. Hence, this Court ordered notice to the appellants. Accordingly, the Registry sent notice to the appellants, however, the notice sent to the first appellant was returned with an endorsement as "left without instruction" and the notice sent to the second appellant was returned with an endorsement as "deceased".
¶2In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution in respect of the first appellant and this Second Appeal is dismissed as abated in respect of the second appellant. No costs.
22.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes skn To:
1.The Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam
2.The Additional District Munsif No.1, Kumbakonam.
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. skn
22.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 22.09.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY 1.Mumtaj Begam 2.K.M.Savukkathali ... Appellants -vs- 1.Ameer Batcha 2.Munusamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 17.03.2003 made in A.S.No.120 of 2002 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 08.01.2002 made in O.S.No. 181 of 1997 on the file of the Additional District Munsif No.1, Kumbakonam. For Appellants ... No appearance For Respondents ... Mr.K.Gnanasekaran for R1
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.