- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 December 2023
- Bench
- S Justice R. Kalaimathi
- Case no.
- SA 1189/2004
Judgment
JUDGMENT As there was no representation for the appellant on the previous hearing, the matter is posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'.
¶2Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. The respondents are represented through counsel. Hence, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
06.12.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Sankarankoil
2.The I Additional District Munsif, Sankarankoil
3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.KALAIMATHI
, J.
mbi
06.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI Thai alias Madathiammal ...Appellant vs. 1.Ramasamy alias Raja 2.Chellathuraichi ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 21.01.2004 in A.S.No.84 of 2003 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Sankarankoil confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 27.06.2003 in O.S.No.108 of 1998 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Sankarankoil. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.A.Arumugam
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.