- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 November 2023
- Bench
- S Justice R. Kalaimathi
- Case no.
- SA 1003/2004
Judgment
JUDGMENT When the matter came up on 17.10.2023, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the matter was settled between the parties and it was posted on 02.11.2023. On 02.11.2023, as there was no representation for the appellant, it is posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'.
¶2Today also there is no representation for the appellant, and hence the Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
21.11.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To
1.The Sub Judge, Thoothukudi
2.The District Munsif, Srivaikuntam
3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.KALAIMATHI
, J.
mbi
21.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI Srivaikuntam Kottai Pillaimar Podhu Fund Sangam, Management Swami, Azhagar Dwadesi Kattalai, At Srivaikuntam, Rep. by its Trustee Manoharan Pillai ...Appellant vs. 1.Samuel Ponnuswami 2.S.Sudalamuthu 3.S.Appavu ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 12.11.2003 in A.S.No.53 of 2002 on the file of the Sub Judge, Thoothukudi reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 12.02.2002 in O.S.No.54 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Srivaikuntam. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.