VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Abathu Katha Pillai v. Karuppan Chettiar

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 September 2023
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
SA 2194/2003

Judgment

J U D G M E N T This second appeal was listed twice before the Joint Registrar (Judicial) for taking steps and for paying batta with correct address. However, none appeared on behalf of the appellant in all the occasions. Therefore, the second appeal was listed before this Court for appropriate orders.

¶2When this matter was listed on 12.09.2023, there was no appearance on behalf of the appellant, hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption, 'for dismissal' today (15.09.2023).

¶3Today, even though the matter is listed under the caption for dismissal, neither the learned counsel for the appellant nor the learned counsel for the respondents is present to prosecute the appeal. It shows that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, this second appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

15.09.2023 RR To

1.The Principal Sub Judge, Madurai

2.The District Munsif, Melur

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

,J.

RR

15.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.A..No.2194 of 2003 Abathu Katha Pillai ... Appellant Vs. 1.Karuppan Chettiar 2.Ravichandran 3.State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the District Collector, Office of the collectorate Maduai. ... Respondents PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 18.03.2003 passed by the learned Principal Sub Judge, Madurai in A.S.No.10 of 2003 partly allowing the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif, Melur dated 28.11.2002 in O.S.No. 162 of 2000. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.