VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Kaliyammal v. Rajamanickam

DISMISSED AS ABATED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
31 August 2023
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
SA 1816/2003

Judgment

JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the appellants 2 and 3 died and in respect of the first appellant also, notice sent to her was returned as died.

¶2Though the appellants died long before, till date, no steps have been taken to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased appellants. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

31.08.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order ssb To

1.The Additional Subordinate Court, Kumbakonam

2.The First Additional District Munsif Court, Kumbakonam

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

, J.

ssb

31.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and C.M.P(MD).No.16523 of 2003 1.Kaliyammal 2.Duraisamy 3.Sivasamy ...Appellants vs. Rajamanickam ... Respondent Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.10.2001 in A.S.No.158 of 1999 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Kumbakonam, reversing the decree and judgment in O.S.No.44 of 1990 dated 30.10.1998 on the file of the First Additional District Munsif Court, Kumbakonam. For Appellants : Mr.V.K.Vijayaraghavan For Respondent : Mr.R.Devaraj

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.