The Deputy Commercial Tax v. R.Selvaraj,

JUDGMENT Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the appellants. Though the respondents 1 and 2, who are the plaintiffs in the suit, are the contesting respondents, till date, the appellants have not taken any steps to serve notice on them. It shows that the appellants are not interested in pursuing this appeal. Therefore, this Court has no other option except to dismiss this appeal for non-prosecution. Accordingly, this Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

12.09.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Yuva To

1.The Additional District Judge, Dindigul.

2.The Principal District Munsif, Dindigul.

3.The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

, J.

Yuva

12.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY 1.The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Chitrakara Street, Dr.Thangaraj Salai, Commercial Tax Office Complex, Madurai. 2.The Commercial Tax Officer, Commercial Tax Buildings, No.5, Dindigul. ... Appellants / Respondents 2 & 3 / Defendants 2 & 3 -Vs- 1.R.Selvaraj 2.J.Rathinasamy ... Respondents 1 & 2 / Appellants / Plaintiffs 3.Thangaraj ... 3rd Respondent / 1st Defendant PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the judgment and decree of the Additional District Court, Dindigul, dated 03.07.2000 made in A.S.No.75 of 1999, confirming the judgment and decree of the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul, dated 03.02.1999 made in O.S.No.407 of 1997. For Appellants : No Appearance