Ilangovan v. Ponchayat Union,Rep. by Its

JUDGMENT Since Mr.V.Bharathidasan, learned counsel who appeared for the appellants has been elevated as Judge, Elevation Memo was sent to the appellants and the same was also served on the appellants on 30.11.2021 itself.

¶2Inspite of the receipt of Elevation Memo, no steps were taken by the appellants either to appear before this Court or to engage a counsel, which shows that the appellants are not interested to prosecute with the appeal. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

18.08.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The Sub Judge, Pattukkottai

2.The District Munsif, Pattukkottai

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

, J.

mbi

18.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.A.No.379 of 2002 & C.M.P.Nos.3005 & 3006 / 2002 1.Ilangovan 2.Mahalingam ...Appellants vs. 1.Panchayat Union, Rep. by its Commissioner, Peravurani Panchayat Union, Thanjavur Distirct. 2.Rangarajan 3.Ramu 4.Karuppaiah 5.Nadimuthu 6.Maruthamuthu ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 31.10.2001 in A.S.No. 5 of 2001 on the file of the Sub Court, Pattukkottai reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 30.08.2000 in O.S.No.463 of 1995 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pattukkottai. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance