- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 August 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA 1421/2002
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Malar Muthusamy ...Appellant in all appeals vs.
1.M/s.Alagu Filaments, Rep. by its Partner, S.Senguttuvan, No.93, Karur Athur Industrial Estate (Sidco), Vennaimalai P.O., Karur - 639 006.
2.M/s.Madhu Filaments, Rep. by its Partner, A.V.Palanisamy, No.92, Karur Athur Industrial Estate (Sidco), Vennaimalai Post, Karur - 639 006.
3.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Karur - 639 001.
4.The Executive Engineer (O & M), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Karur - 639 001.
5.The Assistant Executive Engineer (O & M) Construction, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Karur - 639 001.
6.The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Vengamedu, Karur - 639 006. ...Respondents in all appeals Common Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 03.04.2002 in A.S.Nos.203, 204 & 206 of 1999 on the file of the Principal District Court at Karur reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 03.08.1999 in O.S.Nos.935 & 971 of 1996 respectively on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Karur. In all the appeals, For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance COMMON JUDGMENT When the matters came up for hearing on last occasion, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant in all the appeals submitted that he has sent a letter to his client, however, the same returned with an endorsement 'left' and sought time to get appropriate instruction from the lower Court counsel. Therefore, this Court directed the Registry to print the name of the appellant as well as the name of the appellant counsel in the cause list and list the matter on 18.08.2023.
¶2As per the direction of this Court, the name of the appellant as well as the appellant counsel is printed in the cause list today. However, neither the appellant nor the appellant counsel is present, which shows that the appellant is not interested to prosecute with the appeals.
¶3In view of the same, the Second Appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
18.08.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To
1.The Principal District Court at Karur
2.The Principal District Munsif Court, Karur
3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.A.Nos.1421otoo1423oofo2002 oKRISHNANoRAMASAMYoo,oJo. mbi ooooooooooooooooo S.A.Nos.1421otoo1423oofo2002
18.08.2023 Pageo5oofo5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.