Meenambal, v. 1.Thangaponnu,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.A.No.100 of 2001 and Tr.A.S.No.172 of 2003 S.A.No.100 of 2001 Meenambal

... Appellant Vs.

1.Thangaponnu

2.Rajammal

3.Rajagopal

4.Rajendran

5.Minor Vaidehi (Minor 5th respondent by grandmother and guardian Thangaponnu) ... Respondents PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Karur dated 23.09.1999 in A.S.No.11 of 1991, reversing the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif, Karur, dated 09.02.1990 in O.S.No.108 of 1988. For Appellant : Mr.T.M.Hariharan For R1 to R3 and R5 : Mr.I.Velpradeep Tr.A.S.No.172 of 2003 Tmt.Meenambal

... Appellant Vs.

1.Tmt.Thangaponnu

2.Tmt.Rajammal

3.Tmt.Rajagopal

4.Tmt.Rajendran

5.Tmt.Vaidehi ... Respondents PRAYER: The Transfer Appeal Suit is filed against the judgment and decree passed by the Court of Subordinate Judge, Karur in O.S.No.266 of 1997, dated

23.09.1999. For Appellant : Mr.T.M.Hariharan For Respondents : No appearance C O M M O N J U D G M E N T The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that in spite of repeated reminders, the appellant has not turned up to give instruction in the second appeal and the transfer appeal suit. Hence, he reported no instruction from his client. It appears that the appellant in the second appeal and the transfer appeal suit has no interest in prosecuting these appeals. Therefore, both the Second Appeal and the Transfer Appeal Suit are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

21.09.2023 akv To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Karur.

2.The District Munsif, Karur.

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.A.No.100oofo2001o&oTR.A.S.No.172oofo2003 oKRISHNANoRAMASAMYoo,Jo. o oooooooakv S.A.No.100oofo2001 and Tr.A.S.No.172oofo2003

21.09.2023