Athiyaman .C v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The second respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned representation on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. The second respondent shall put the interested persons, if any, on notice before passing final order. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of, accordingly. No costs.

21.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No RM To:

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.

2.The Tahsildar Singampunari Taluk, Sivagangai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. RM

21.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN C.Athiyaman ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 2.The Tahsildar Singampunari Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue the Legal Heir Certificate of the petitioner's father Chockalingam by considering the petitioner's representation dated 14.12.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.K.G.Arunkumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Ra.Ramachandran, Additional Government Pleader