Dharani Balan v. State of Tamil Nadu

O R D E R This Writ Petition is filed in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents No.1 to 3 not to harass the petitioner, under the guise of enquiry on the alleged complaint given by the 5th respondent, which is purely a civil dispute.

¶2The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the fifth respondent, enquiry was undertaken in C.No.162 of 2023. During the course of enquiry, finding that it is a civil issue between the parties, it was closed on 21.12.2023, advising the parties to workout their remedy through appropriate civil process.

¶3Recording the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, nothing survives for further consideration or direction in this matter. Hence, this matter has become infructuous.

¶4With the above said observation, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

22.12.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No INDU To

¶1State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶2The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dindigul Town Range, Dindigul.

¶3The Inspector of Police,, District Crime Branch, Dindigul.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J INDU W.P(MD) No.30879 of 2023 Dated 22.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.12.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P(MD) No.30879 of 2023 Dharani Balan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dindigul Town Range, Dindigul. 3. The Inspector of Police,, District Crime Branch, Dindigul. 4. Ravi 5. Latha ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents No.1 to 3 not to harass the petitioner, under the guise of enquiry on the alleged complaint given by the 5th respondent, which is purely a civil dispute. For Petitioner :Mr.P.M.Vishnu Varthanan For R1 to R3 :Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side)