- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 20 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 30487/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2.The respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The respondent will put on notice all the interested parties before passing final order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the respondent to pass order one way or the other.
3.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
20.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To The Tahsildar, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
20.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.Devarajan ... Petitioner Vs. The Tahsildar, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to grant patta to the petitioner in respect of the Survey Nos. 288/1B, 288/2B, 288/3A, 364/19, 288/2A and 288/2B with an extent of 57 1/2 cents situated in Jambuduraikottai Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District by considering the E-Challan dated 28.05.2022 issued by the respondent, within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.I.Robert Chandra Kumar For Respondent : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.