VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Periyasamy v. The Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 December 2023
Bench
V.Sivagnanamauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 22961/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20/12/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V. SIVAGNANAM Periyasamy ... Petitioner/Accused No.1

Vs The Inspector of Police, Thiruchuli Police Station, Virudhunagar District. Crime No.278/2023.. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Mohamed Ibrahim.J,

Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.M.S.Sethuraman,

Additional Public Prosecutor

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.278/2023 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A1, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

28.11.2023 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 279,336,290,308, 506(ii) of IPC and 25(1-A) of Arms Act r/w. 184,188 of M.V.Act in Crime No.278 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 27.11.2023 at about 4.00 pm., the petitioner along with other accused inorder to create law and order problem and also create fear over the public were roaming in two wheeler bearing Reg. No. TN 65 AX 1173 in a rash and negligent manner keeping sword in their hands and proclaimed themselves to be rowdies Hence the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner is in custody from

28.11.2023, hence he seeks bail.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police would submit that the petitioner along with other accused inorder to create law and order problem and also create fear over the public were roaming in two wheeler bearing Reg. No. TN 65 AX 1173 in a rash and negligent manner keeping sword in their hands and proclaimed themselves to be rowdies, hence he objected to grant bail to the petitioner. However he fairly concedes that no one sustained injuries in the said occurrecne.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances and also considering the period of incarceration and also taking into consideration the fact that no one sustained injuries in the said occurrence and also taking into consideration the principle stated by the Honourable Supreme Court in Sanjay Chandra and others vs. CBI reported in (2012)1 SCC 40, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: [i] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchulai, Virudhunagar District and on further conditions that:

(ii) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on receipt of summons;

(iv)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness;

(v)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial.

(vi) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the CRLeOP(MD).eNo.22961eofe2023 learnedoMagistrate/TrialoCourtohimselfoasolaidodownobyotheoHon'bleoSupremeoCourt inoP.K.Shajiovs.oStateoofoKeralao[(2005)AIRoSCWo5560]. oooooovii)Ifotheoaccusedothereafteroabsconds,oaofreshoFIRocanobeoregisteredounderoSection 229AoIPC. oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooosd/- ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooo20/12/2023 oooo ooooooooooo/oTRUEoCOPYo/ ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooo20/12/2023 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooSub-AssistantoRegistraro(C.S.ooo) ooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooMaduraioBenchoofoMadrasoHighoCourt, ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooMaduraio-o625o023.oo AAV TO 1oooTHEoJUDICIALoMAGISTRATE, THIRUCHULAI,oVIRUDHUNAGARoDISTRICT. 2oooDOoTHROUGHoTHEoCHIEFoJUDICIALoMAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGARoDISTRICToAToSRIVILLIPUTHUR. 3oooTHEoINSPECTORoOFoPOLICE THIRUCHULIoPOLICEoSTATION, VIRUDHUNAGARoDISTRICT. 4oooTHEoOFFICERoINCHARGE, DISTRICToJAIL,oVIRUDHUNAGAR. 5oooTHEoADDITIONALoPUBLICoPROSECUTOR, ooo MADURAIoBENCHoOFoMADRASoHIGHoCOURT, ooo MADURAI.o +1oCCotooM/s.J.MOHAMEDoIBRAHIM,oAdvocateo(oSR-18044[I]odatedo20/12/2023o) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.22961 of 2023 Date :20/12/2023 SS/SAR- /20/12/2023/5P/7C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.