M.Jeyarani v. The Tahsildar

ORDER Heard both sides.

2.The petitioner claims to be the adoptive daughter of the deceased Jakkammal. Jakkammal had a sister by name Valli and the petitioner was her biological daughter. Valli passed away when the petitioner was young child and that is how Jakkammal came to have adopted the petitioner.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner relies on the entry in the family ration card. But then, these aspects cannot be gone into by the first respondent. It is only the jurisdictional civil Court that can grant relief sought for.

4.Granting liberty to the petitioner to move the jurisdictional civil Court for getting declaration that she was adopted by Jakkammal as daughter, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

20.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The Tahsildar, Thiruchuzhi Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Revenue Inspector, Firka, Thiruchuzhi Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)No.26190 of 2023

20.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.26190 of 2023 M.Jeyarani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Thiruchuzhi Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Revenue Inspector, Firka, Thiruchuzhi Taluk, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned order dated 01.11.2023 passed by the first respondent and cancel the same consequently directing the first respondent to issue the Legal heirs certificate on the demise of Jakkammal, within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Senthilkumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader