Kaaturaja .S v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

20.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Theni

2.The District Revenue Officer,

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam,

4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Unjampatti,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

20.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.Kaaturaja ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Theni 2.The District Revenue Officer, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, 4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Unjampatti, ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.11.2023 and also to conclude the proceedings pending before the 2nd respondent vide Na.Ka.No. 31421/2022/B1 within a time frame stipulated by this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Gopinathan For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasurbamani Special Government Pleader