VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Central Higher Secondary School v. The Chief Educational Officer

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 December 2023
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 29907/2023

Judgment

ORDER With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶2The present writ petition has been filed by an aided Minority stand alone Institution challenging the order passed by the first respondent herein, wherein the request of the Management to approve the appointment of B.T Assistant (Science) Teacher has been rejected.

¶3A perusal of the impugned order indicates that the approval for the appointment has been rejected on the ground that SLP(C)No.15702 of 2021 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court is pending challenging the orders of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in a batch of writ appeals in W.A(MD)Nos.76 of 2019 etc., dated 31.03.2021. The other reasons cited in the impugned order is that there are surplus Teachers in the same revenue District. The said order is put to challenge in the present writ petition.

¶4The pendency of SLP as against the orders of this Court in a batch of writ appeals in W.A(MD)Nos.76 of 2019 etc., has nothing to do with the approval of the appointment of the Teacher in the petitioner Institution. The Institution being a stand alone Institution, the question of surplus in the revenue District would not affect the right of the Institution to appoint Teachers.

¶5In view of the above said facts, the order impugned in the writ petition is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the file of the first respondent herein to pass orders approving the appointment of B.T Assistant (Science) Teachers with effect from 01.06.2018, in case if the appointment is within the staff fixation order for the relevant academic year.

¶6This writ petition stands allowed to the extent as stated above. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition stands closed.

18.12.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR To

1.The Chief Educational Officer, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin-628 002.

2.The District Educational Officer, Tiruchendur-628 215, Tuticorin District.

3.B.T Assistant (Science), Central Higher Secondary School, Kayalpatnam-628 204, Tuticorin District.

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

BTR

18.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and W.M.P(MD)No.25789 of 2023 Central Higher Secondary School, Kayalpatnam-628 204, Tuticorin District, Represented by its Correspondent. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin-628 002. 2.The District Educational Officer, Tiruchendur-628 215, Tuticorin District. 3.J.Aysha Beevi, B.T Assistant (Science), Central Higher Secondary School, Kayalpatnam-628 204, Tuticorin District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the first respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.882/Aa3/2020, dated 16.08.2023 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to approve the appointment of the third respondent as B.T Assistant (Science) in the petitioner School with effect from 01.06.2018 in pursuance of its proposal, dated 24.12.2018. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jerin Mathew For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.N.GA.Natraj Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.