VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Shanmugam v. The Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 December 2023
Bench
V.Sivagnanamauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 22431/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18/12/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V. SIVAGNANAM Shanmugam, ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Naducauvery Police Station, Thanjavur District. Crime No.424/2023. ... Respondent/Complainant

For Petitioner : M/s.Sivasubramanian.A,

Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.M.S.Sethuraman,

Additional Public Prosecutor

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.424/2023 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.12.2023 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379 of IPC r/w.21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act in Crime No.424 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has illegally transported ¼ unit of river sand in a bullock cart. Hence the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner is in custody from

02.12.2023, hence he seeks bail.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police would submit that petitioner has illegally transported ¼ unit of river sand in a bullock cart, hence he objected to grant bail to the petitioner. However he fairly concedes that no previous case is pending against the petitioner.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances and also considering the period of incarceration and also taking into consideration the fact that no previous case is pending against the petitioner and also taking into consideration the principle stated by the Honourable Supreme Court in Sanjay Chandra and others vs. CBI reported in

(2012)1 SCC 40, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: [i] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru and on further conditions that:

(ii) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on receipt of summons;

(iv)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness;

(v)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial.

(vi) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

vii)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. sd/- 18/12/2023 / TRUE COPY / 18/12/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. AAV To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru.

¶2Do through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur District at Kumbakonam.

¶3The Officer Incharge, Sub Jail, Thanjavur.

¶4The Inspector of Police, Naducauvery Police Station, Thanjavur District.

¶5The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.22431 of 2023 Date :18/12/2023 SSA/18.12.2023/5P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.