VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sakthivel v. The Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
13 December 2023
Bench
V.Sivagnanamauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 22454/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 13/12/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V. SIVAGNANAM Sakthivel

... Petitioner/Accused No.2

Vs The Inspector of Police, Thuvarankurichi Police Station, Trichy District. (Crime No.224/2023). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Muniyandi S,

Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.Rms.Sethuraman,

Additional Public Prosecutor

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.224/2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A2, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

21.09.2023 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 506(ii), 420 and 395 IPC, in Crime No.224 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 18.09.2023, as per the instructions of A1, the defacto complainant and his friend Karthick took a sum of Rs.14,50,000/- and went to meet A1 in a car to purchase gold from him. At that time, the accused persons came there in a car in police uniform and one accused took the amount from the defacto complainant and when it was questioned by the said Karthick, one accused threatened them with knife and took the amount and Karthick and locked the defacto complainant and others in the case and went away. After that, they dropped the said Karthick and took the money and cellphone from him. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that no recover is made from this petitioner and he is in custody from 21.09.2023. Hence, he prays for bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police would submit that in this case, investigation is pending. Hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances and considering the fact that no recover is made from this petitioner and also considering the period of incarceration and taking into consideration of the principle stated by the Honourable Supreme Court in Sanjay Chandra and others vs. CBI reported in (2012)1 SCC 40, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

(i) Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai, Trichy District on further conditions that:

(ii) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned Court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the said Magistrate Court on the first working day of every English calendar month until further orders.

(iv) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness;

(v)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial.

(vi) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judge/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the CRLeOP(MD).eNo.22454eofe2023 learnedoJudge/TrialoCourtohimselfoasolaidodownobyotheoHon'bleoSupremeoCourtoin P.K.Shajiovs.oStateoofoKeralao[(2005)AIRoSCWo5560]. oooooovii)Ifotheoaccusedothereafteroabsconds,oaofreshoFIRocanobeoregisteredounderoSection 229AoIPC. oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooosd/- ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooo13/12/2023 oooo ooooooooooo/oTRUEoCOPYo/ ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooo13/12/2023 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooSub-AssistantoRegistraro(C.S.ooo) ooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooMaduraioBenchoofoMadrasoHighoCourt, ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooMaduraio-o625o023.oo SKN TO 1oooTHEoJUDICIALoMAGISTRATE MANAPPARAIoTRICHYoDISTRICT 2oooDO-THROUGHo: THEoCHIEFoJUDICIALoMAGISTRATE,oTRICHYoDISTRICT. 3oooTHEoOFFICERoINCHARGE, SUBoJAIL,oMANAPPARAI. 4oooTHEoINSPECTORoOFoPOLICE THUVARANKURICHIoPOLICEoSTATION,oTRICHYoDISTRICT. 5oooTHEoADDITIONALoPUBLICoPROSECUTOR, ooo MADURAIoBENCHoOFoMADRASoHIGHoCOURT, ooo MADURAI.o ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.22454 of 2023 Date :13/12/2023 SS/SAR- /13/12/2023/5P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.