VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Selvi v. The Joint Commissioner

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 December 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 29022/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner is a tenant of the 3rd respondent Temple in respect of the shop No.16E, Kondi Theru, Cumbum. The petitioner claims that she is the tenant for more than 30 years and she is selling the cow dung manure by using this shop. She further claims that initially, the monthly rent was fixed at Rs.2404/-, now, it was increased to Rs.7605/- without issuing any notice to her.

¶2The 3rd respondent, by order dated 22.01.2018, demanded the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.6,20,242/- towards arrears of rent and also initiated action under Section 78 of the HR&CE Act. As against the same, the petitioner has filed a writ petition before this Court in W.P.

(MD)No.19144 of 2019. This Court, by order dated 03.09.2019 in W.M.P.(MD)No.15502 of 2019, passed an order of interim stay on condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.7 lakh on or before 01.10.2019 towards the arrears of rent, before the 3rd respondent Temple.

¶3It appears that the petitioner has not paid that amount as directed by this Court and thereafter, the writ petition was allowed to be dismissed for non-prosecution. Now, the 2nd respondent, by order dated 17.11.2023, has initiated action under Section 79 of HR&CE Act to vacate petitioner. Challenging the same, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶4Since the petitioner is having a huge arrears of rent and has also failed to utilize the opportunity, which has been provided by this Court in W.M.P.(MD)No.15505 of 2019, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. If the petitioner pays the arrears of rent, the respondents shall consider the case of the petitioner sympathetically. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

11.12.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The Joint Commissioner, HR&CE Department, Madurai.

¶2The Assistant Commissioner, HR&CE Department, Dindigul.

¶3The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Kambarayaperumal Thirukovil, Cumbum, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

11.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.25068 of 2023 Selvi ... Petitioner versus 1. The Joint Commissioner, HR&CE Department, Madurai. 2. The Assistant Commissioner, HR&CE Department, Dindigul. 3. The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Kambarayaperumal Thirukovil, Cumbum, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.3409/A3 dated 17.11.2023 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sankar For Respondents : Mr.P.Subba Raj, Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.