- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 December 2023
- Bench
- S.M. Subramaniam, V. Lakshminarayanan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 29174/2023
Judgment
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.) The order impugned in the Writ Petition is possession notice. This can be challenged by way of an appeal before the jurisdictional Debts Recovery Tribunal. Therefore, granting 15 days time to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the jurisdictional Debts Recovery Tribunal, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneuos petition is closed. (S.M.S., J.) & (V.L.N., J.)
12.12.2023
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Yuva
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. Yuva
12.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.25244 of 2023 Alamelumangai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Zonal Manager, Indian Bank Zonal Office, Jenni Plaza, No.5, Bharathiyar Salai, Trichy. 2.The Branch Manager / Authorized Officer, Indian Bank, Vembangudi Branch, Pudukkottai District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned possession notice dated 10.10.2023 issued by the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondents to take appropriate action against the erring Branch Manager of the 2nd respondent Bank. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arputharaj
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.