- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 November 2023
- Bench
- The Chief Justice, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 29225/2022
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] We have heard Mr.S.Satheesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Thilakkumar, learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4.
¶2The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the road has been laid and is opened in the subject place.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instructions of the petitioner are otherwise. The road is not laid nor opened.
¶4Be that as it may, the petitioner may file necessary application with the authority concerned. The authority concerned upon the receipt of the application of the petitioner, may conduct a survey and depending upon the report of the survey, he may take further steps.
¶5The Writ Petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No costs. [S.V.G., C.J.] [L.V.G., J.]
30.11.2023 Index : Yes / No
bala To
¶1The District Collector, Thanjavur District.
¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.
¶3The Tahsildar, Orathanadu Taluk, Thanjavur District.
¶4The Tahsildar, Karambakkudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. bala
30.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI P.Manimaran ... Petitioner vs. 1. The District Collector, Thanjavur District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District. 3. The Tahsildar, Orathanadu Taluk, Thanjavur District. 4. The Tahsildar, Karambakkudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 5. Govindaraj ... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take appropriate action to lay the road in S.No.3/1 to an extent of 0.16.19 Ares by implementing the recommendation of 4th respondent in Na.Ka.No.3420/2020/A2 dated 15.11.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Satheesh Kumar For R1 to R4 : Mr.P.Thilakkumar, Government Pleader For R5 : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.