- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 November 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 27145/2023
Judgment
ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that nothing survives in this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement.
2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
30.11.2023 Internet : Yes / No DSK To
1.The District Collector, Thanjavur.
2.The Sub Collector / The District Manager, TASMAC Limited, Thanjavur.
3.The Divisional Manager, TASMAC, SIDCO Complex, Nanjikottai Road, Thanjavur.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
30.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 30.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.P.Fleix Raj ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Thanjavur. 2.The Sub Collector / The District Manager, TASMAC Limited, Thanjavur. 3.The Divisional Manager, TASMAC,SIDCO Complex, Nanjikottai Road, Thanjavur. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to close down the TASMAC shop No.7813 functioning at TS.No.365,No.32 and 32A, in Nageswaram North Street, Kumbakonam Town, Thanjavur District and shift the said TASMAC Shop No. 7813 to some other place, within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Senthil For Respondent : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, No.1 Additional Government Pleader For Respondent : Mr.H.Arumugam, Nos.2 and 3 Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.