Periyasamy v. The District Collector

ORDER Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that by efflux of time, the relief sought in this Writ Petition does not remain for consideration at this length of time and he has made an endorsement to that effect in the court record. In fine, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

25.01.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No TO:

1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

3.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition), NHAI, 1332, Pleasant Street, Pleasant Nagar, Nagercoil – 690 001.

4.The Sub Inspector of Police, Thenthamaraikulam Police Station, Kanyakumari District. P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J. Sm

25.01.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.01.2023 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU and W.M.P. (MD) Nos. 17790 and 18991 of 2017 Periyasamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 3.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition), NHAI, 1332, Pleasant Street, Pleasant Nagar, Nagercoil – 690 001. 4.The Sub Inspector of Police, Thenthamaraikulam Police Station, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the 4th respondent from preventing the petitioner from shifting the temple namely Arulmigu Dharmasastha temple to his private patta land in Survey No.186/1A Kulasekaram Village, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District. For Petitioner : Mr. P.T.Ramesh Raja For Respondents : Mr. M.Senthil Ayyanar (R1 to R3) Government Advocate Mr. S.Manikandan (R4)