VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

D.Albert John, v. The Divisional Manager,

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 December 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16241/2017

Judgment

O R D E R

This writ petition was filed in the year 2017 for extension of lease of canteen, under the respondent Corporation.

2.Today(06.12.2023), when this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submits that the period for which extension sought for itself is over and therefore nothing survives in this writ petition.

3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

06.12.2023 NCC: Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes vrn To The Divisional Manager, Arasu Rubber Corporation, (A Tamil Nadu Government Enterprise), Keeriparai Division, Keeriparai P.O, Kanyakumari District. W.P(MD)No.16241 of 2017 B.PUGALENDHI,oJ. vrn Orderomadeoin W.P(MD)No.16241oofo2017oand WMP(MD)oNo.12918oofo2017

06.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD)No.16241 of 2017 and WMP(MD) No.12918 of 2017 D.Albert John ... Petitioner Vs The Divisional Manager, Arasu Rubber Corporation, (A Tamil Nadu Government Enterprise), Keeriparai Division, Keeriparai P.O, Kanyakumari District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records pertaining to the impugned order dated 19.08.2017 in Ka.No.910/16Va on the file of the respondent and consequently direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to run the canteen till the term of the tender being 30.06.2018. For Petitioner : Mr.Puhazh Gandhi For Respondent : Mr.C.Selvaraj

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.