- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 14 December 2023
- Bench
- R.Vijayakumar
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 26145/2023
Judgment
ORDER The present writ petition has been filed by the wife of a deceased Physical Education Teacher seeking to quash the order passed by the third respondent herein, wherein the request of revision of pay scale by granting Selection Grade / Special Grade was rejected.
¶2According to the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner's husband along with others had filed W.P(MD)No.1019 of 2011 seeking a Mandamus as against the authorities to extend the benefit of G.O(Ms)No.216, Finance (PC) Department, dated 22.03.1993 and G.O(Ms)No. 270 of the same Department, dated 26.08.2010. The said writ petition was disposed of on 20.03.2012, directing the authorities to extend the said benefit within a period of three months. In compliance with the said order, the Principal Secretary of School Education Department had issued G.O(Ms)No. 181, School Education [Pa.Ka3(1)] Department, dated 06.09.2013 conferring the said benefits upon the writ petitioner's husband and 95 others.
¶3The petitioner's husband had passed away on 30.04.2013. Thereafter when the petitioner had approached the Educational Authorities for conferment of the said benefit, the same has been rejected under the impugned order, dated
08.02.2021 which is under challenge in the present writ petition.
¶4As it could be seen from G.O(Ms)No.181, dated 06.09.2013, already benefits have been conferred upon the petitioner's husband. However, over looking the said Government order, the present impugned order has been passed. Therefore, the order impugned in the writ petition is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the file of the third respondent herein. The third respondent is directed to reconsider the same in the light of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.1019 of 2011, dated 20.03.2012 and G.O(Ms)No. 181, School Education Department, dated 06.09.2013 and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶5This writ petition stands allowed to the extent as stated above. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition stands closed.
14.12.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR To
1.The Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu, Finance (Pay cell) Department, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai.
2.The Director of School Education, (Higher Secondary), College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-6.
3.The District Educational Officer, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai District.
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
BTR
14.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and W.M.P(MD)Nos.22500 of 2023 Arundhathi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Secretary to Government, Finance (Pay cell) Department, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai. 2.The Director of School Education, (Higher Secondary), College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-6. 3.The District Educational Officer, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order, dated 08.02.2021 of the third respondent in O.Mu.No.480/A4/2021 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to pay the benefits to which the petitioner's husband is entitled as per the G.O(Ms)No.181, dated 06.09.2013 to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Anandkumar For Respondents : Mr.V.Om Prakash Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.