- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 December 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15148/2017
Judgment
ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infrcutuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
06.12.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To The Superintending Engineer, Middle Cauvery Basin Circle, PWD, WRD, Tiruchirapalli – 620 020.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy
06.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.11964 to 11967 of 2017 Veera Construction and Enterprises, Rep. through its Managing Partner, M.Sathiyaselan, having Office at No.155B, Neerpalani Post, Viralimalai Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ... Petitioner versus The Superintending Engineer, Middle Cauvery Basin Circle, PWD, WRD, Tiruchirapalli – 620 020. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to tenders in Notification No. 04/2017-2018/V3/Na.Ka.Va.La./Trichy dated 27.06.2017, in which, for rehabilitation and modernization of 8 numbers of tanks in Viralimalai block and 3 numbers of Tanks in Annavasal Block, Illupur Taluk, Pudukkottai District in vide Sl.No.3 in 03/TN IAMP (TNIAMWARM II)/WRD/PON/works/phase/2017-18 and for rehabilitation and modernization of 11 numbers of tanks in Viralimalai block Illupur Taluk, Pudukkottai District in vide Sl.No.5 in 05/TN IAMP (TNIAMWARM II) / WRD / PON/ Works/phase I/2017-18 on the file of the respondent and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and in consequence thereof direct the respondent to quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and in consequent thereof direct the respondent to conduct the tender process afresh in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Sekar For Respondent : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.